(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload
See other formats

Full text of "State of Maryland uniform crime reports"

UNIV Of MO COI I I (.1 I'AMK 



,hv 3 143Q Q53151b3 D 

6793 

.M3S74 

2006 



:RIME IN MARYLAND 




2006 UNIFORM CRIME REPORT 



GOVERNOR MARTIN OMALLEY 

LT. GOVERNOR ANTHONY G. BROWN 

COLONEL THOMAS E. HUTCHINS, SUPERINTENDENT 

MARYLAND STATE POLICE 



CENTRAL RECORDS DIVISION 

IDA J. WILLIAMS, DIVISION DIRECTOR 



UNIFORM 

CRIME 

REPORTING 

PROGRAM 

JOHN VESPA, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 
DENISE VIDI SCHERER, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 




- ^ Ul.- , 



MARTIN O'MAIXEY 

GOVERNOR 



ANTHONY G. BROWN 

LT GOVERNOR 



STATE OF MARYLAND 
MARYLAND STATE POLICE 

1201 REISTERSTOWN ROAD 

PIKESVILLE. MARYLAND 21208-3899 

410-486-3101 

TOLL FREE: 1-800-525-5555 

TDD. 410-486-067^ 




fKOMAS fc. "TIM" HU''.M N8 

SFCfET.l. 



.June 1,2007 



The Honorable Martin O' Ma.lev S^LUnOOQ 9^S 

Governor * , UOBOS^ n.n»,*JB|fl 

state House Univ. of Maryland Libraries Lm g z Nn p 

Annapolis MI) 21401 ,,,_ 

JUN 2 6 2007 s9UBjqn puB|AJW P " A ! u n 

Dear Governor O'Mallev : Maryicti iu o^.itJCtlOn 

State Documents 

In accordance with Public Safety Article 2, Subsection 307 and 308, ol the 
Annotated Code of Maryland , the Maryland State Police is pleased to submit the 2006 
Uniform Crime Report, Crime in Maryland . This publication represents the 32 nd annual 
report. 

The 2006 Crime in Maryland publication provides valuable information to law 
enforcement personnel, members of State government and interested parties, including; 
academic, civic and research organizations. The information is beneficial in the assessment 
of crime patterns and the development of effective strategies to combat criminal acts. 

Maryland law enforcement agencies contribute crime data to the Maryland 
Uniform Crime Reporting Program. These crime statistics could not have been compiled 
without the dedication and cooperation of all police agencies, sheriff offices and other 
specialized police agencies throughout Maryland. The contributions of those agencies who 
provide statistical data to the Uniform Crime Reporting Program permit the Maryland 
State Police to develop a comprehensive picture of crime in Maryland. 



Sincerely, 




%^*fa&£~~s 



Thomas E. H« 
Superintendent 



TEH:IJW:kj 



'Maryland's Finest" 



Executive Summary 

An annual release since 1975, Crime In Maryland pertains to 
crime statistics. This publication details crime (State, County, 
Municipality and by reporting agency) , clearance rates, arrests, law 
enforcement officers killed or assaulted and law enforcement 
employee data. The statewide Uniform Crime Reporting Program was 
initiated to report crime in Maryland to the National UCR program 
administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Maryland 
program has since increased its data collection with domestic 
violence, hate bias reporting and carjacking statistics. Carjacking 
and hate bias incident statistics are released in separate 
publications to facilitate detailed reporting. 

The Uniform Crime Reporting Program collects information on 
crimes that were selected as an index to represent crime in the 
United States. These index crimes are murder, rape, robbery, 
aggravated assault, breaking or entering, larceny- theft and motor 
vehicle theft. Although not an indexed crime, the crime of arson is 
also collected. 

There were 233,590 total crime incidents reported in 2006 
representing a 2 percent decrease when compared to 2005 crime 
totals. Violent crime consisting of murder, rape, robbery and 
aggravated assault decreased 3 percent . The property crimes of 
breaking or entering, larceny-theft and motor vehicle theft 
experienced a 2 percent decrease. The index crime breakdown is as 
follows : 

Breaking or Entering 4.3% 

Larceny-Theft - 0.8% 

Motor Vehicle Theft -10.4% 

Arson 5.0% 

Total arrests for 2006 were 305,675 representing a 1 percent 
decrease when compared to the total arrests for 2005. Of the total 
arrests 255,115 were adults, a decrease of 1 percent while 50,560 
were juvenile arrests an increase of less than 1 percent. Of the 
total arrests there were 56,728 persons arrested for drug abuse 
violations, an increase of 7 percent. There were 24,078 persons 
arrested for driving while intoxicated, an increase of 2 percent. 

Three law enforcement officers died in the line of duty during 
2006. There were 4,177 officers assaulted which reflected an 
increase of less than 1 percent. This assault figure represents 28 
percent of full time law enforcement officers employed. 

In 2006, there were 15,048 full time law enforcement officers 
employed which represents a less than 1 percent increase. There 
were 2.7 full time law enforcement officers per 1,000 population. 



Murder 


- 0.9% 


Rape 


- 7.0% 


Robbery 


- 0.0% 


Aggravated Assault 


- 5.0% 



Digitized by the Internet Archive 
in 2013 



http://archive.org/details/stateofmarylandu2006stat 



TABLE OF CONTENTS 



Introduction 1 

Crime Factors 7 

Crime Index Offenses 9 

Murder 13 

Rape 2 3 

Robbery . . 2 7 

Aggravated Assault 31 

Breaking or Entering 35 

Larceny-Theft 39 

Motor Vehicle Theft 43 

Arson 4 7 

Domestic Violence 51 

Index Offense Data 65 

Maryland UCR Crime Index Report by Region, County & Agency 66 

Municipality Crime Rate 103 

Maryland Arrest Data 113 

Drug Arrest County Chart 117 

Arrests - Sex & Race 123 

Arrests - Age 124 

Maryland Arrest Report by Region, County & Agency 12 6 

Law Enforcement Officers Killed & Assaulted 201 

Law Enforcement Officers Killed 203 

Law Enforcement Officers Assaulted 205 

Law Enforcement Officers Assaulted by Region, 

County & Agency 207 

Law Enforcement Employee Data 219 

Law Enforcement Employee Rates 221 

Law Enforcement Employee Data by Region, County & Agency.. 222 
Ten Year Crime Index Chart 22 9 



Note: The 2 006 Annual Motor Vehicle Robbery ( "Car jacking" ) Report 
is a separate publication. 



INTRODUCTION 



BACKGROUND 

The Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program is one measure that 
has been taken in the establishment of an effective Criminal Justice 
Information System (CJIS) for the State. This particular phase focuses 
on the incidence of crime and law enforcement. It establishes a method 
to collect, evaluate and process uniform statistical data on crime 
statewide. The Maryland UCR Program provides the means to forward more 
valid data to the Federal Bureau of Investigation from a single agency 
and also to consolidate it into an annual report entitled Crime in 
Maryland . 



NATIONAL UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM 

The counterpart of the Maryland UCR Program is the National UCR Program 
which is under the direction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 
The National Program resulted from a need for a uniform compilation of 
crime statistics nationwide. Uniform Crime Reports were first 
collected in 1930 after being developed by a committee of the 
International Association of Chiefs of Police. The IACP continues to 
serve in an advisory capacity to the FBI in the current operation of 
the Program. 

Crime statistics voluntarily submitted by individual law enforcement 
agencies from all fifty states are presented annually in the FBI's 
publication entitled Crime in the United States . 



MARYLAND UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM 

The FBI has actively assisted individual states in the development of 
State UCR Programs compatible with the National Program. Maryland took 
advantage of this assistance in 1972 and was able to develop its own 
program by 1975. 

The Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program became operational January 
1, 1975. This program consists of the uniform classification, review, 
compilation and analysis of crime statistics reported by all law 
enforcement agencies of the State pursuant to the guidelines and 
regulations prescribed by law. 

The responsibility and authority for the collection and dissemination 
of UCR data is assigned to the Department of State Police in accordance 
with Public Safety Article 2, subsection 307 and 308 of the Annotated 
Code of Maryland. 



PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES 

In keeping with the recommendation of the President's Commission on Law 
Enforcement and the Administration of Justice, the Maryland UCR Program 
was planned for eventual growth into a complete and integrated offender 
based Criminal Justice Information System. Under this program, each 
offender arrested in Maryland is tracked through the entire criminal 
justice system from time of arrest, through the courts, to the 
correctional system where their exit (parole, expiration of sentence, 
etc.) will be recorded. In this manner, a complete "criminal history" 
on individual offenders will be available for use by the police, courts 
and correctional agencies in Maryland. In addition, statistical data 
derived from the CJIS Program will provide assistance in determining 
the overall efficiency of the Criminal Justice System in Maryland and 
will make effective management studies possible. 

The fundamental objectives of the Maryland UCR Program are: 

1. Inform the Governor, legislature, other 
governmental officials and the public as to the 
nature, magnitude and trends of the crime problem 
in Maryland. 

2. Provide law enforcement administrators with 
criminal statistics for administrative and 
operational use. 

3. Determine who commits crimes by age, sex, race and 
other attributes in order to find the proper focus 
for crime prevention and enforcement . 

4. Provide base data and statistics to measure the 
workload and effectiveness of Maryland's Criminal 
Justice System. 

5. Provide base data and statistics to measure the 
effects of prevention and deterrence programs. 

6. Provide base data and statistics for research to 
improve the efficiency, effectiveness and 
performance of criminal justice agencies. 

7. Provide base data to assist in the assessment of 
social and other causes of crime for the 
development of theories of criminal behavior. 

8. Provide the FBI with complete UCR data to be 
included in the national crime reports. 



REPORTING PROCEDURES 

Under the Maryland UCR Program, law enforcement agencies submit 
■specified Uniform Crime Reports. The necessary information for each 
of the required reports is gathered from each agencies record of 
complaints, investigations and arrests. 

Crime data and information is submitted by state, county and municipal 
law enforcement agencies monthly on the number of offenses known to 
them in the following crime categories: 

(1) Criminal Homicide 

(2) Forcible Rape 

(3) Robbery 

(4) Assault 

(5) Breaking or Entering 

(6) Larceny-theft 

(7) Motor Vehicle Theft 

(8) Arson* 

The count of offenses is taken from the record of complaints received 
by law enforcement agencies. This information comes from victims, 
witnesses, other sources or discovered by law enforcement during their 
own operation. Complaints determined by subsequent investigation to 
be unfounded are eliminated from count. The resulting number of 
"actual offenses known to law enforcement agencies" in these crime 
categories are reported without regard for whether anyone is arrested, 
stolen property is recovered, local prosecutive policy or any other 
consideration. 

Reported offenses are recorded by the municipality and county in which 
they occur. Municipal law enforcement agencies report those crimes 
which occur within the cities and state. County agencies report those 
crimes which occur in the counties outside the cities. 

A supplemental report is also submitted each month showing the value 
of stolen and recovered property, the type of property and the type 
of offense within a crime category in which it was taken. This report 
also shows the number of stolen vehicles recovered locally and by 
other jurisdictions. In addition, each agency reports the number of 
persons arrested by them or other agencies for crimes which have 
occurred within their jurisdiction. The arrest report also shows the 
age, sex and race of those arrested and the disposition of juveniles 
by the arresting agency. When applicable, supplemental reports are 
submitted regarding the persons, weapons and circumstances, etc., 
involved in homicides, domestic violence incidents, officer assaults 
and "carjackings". In addition, police employee data is collected on 
an annual basis. 



♦Monthly arson reports are submitted for law enforcement agencies by the State 
Fire Marshal's Office and designated county agencies. 



REVIEW PROCESS 

A major concern in the collection of crime statistics for law 
enforcement agencies throughout the state is the uniformity and 
accuracy of data received. Program aides such as guides and 
instructional classes do not necessarily guarantee the accuracy of the 
reports submitted by the contributors, therefore, additional controls 
are necessary. 

Each report received by the UCR section is recorded, examined and 
reviewed for mathematical accuracy and possibly more important for 
reasonableness. The review process includes numerous checks to ensure 
the validity of information. The elimination of duplicate reporting 
by individual contributors receives particular attention. Minor 
errors are corrected by telephone contact with the contributors. 
Substantial variations and errors are adjusted through personal 
contacts. The personal contacts are invaluable to the accuracy and 
quality of reporting. Field Records Representatives are engaged in 
a constant educational effort and as such, provide a vital link 
between the UCR Program and the contributor. 



POPULATION DATA 

The computation of crime rates as they appear in this report by 
municipality, county and state are based on the latest available 
population estimates for the year. These population estimates are 
provided by the Federal Bureau of Investigation through the 
cooperation and assistance of the United States Bureau of Census. 



LIMITATIONS OF A UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM 

Information currently collected by the Maryland Program is generally 
the same as that gathered by the National System and the methods of 
classifying and scoring offenses and arrests are the same. This 
readily enables comparisons with other states and with the nation, as 
a whole. However, there are limitations to the information collected 
which should be clearly understood before any conclusions are drawn 
from the UCR data presented in this report. 

The main goal of the UCR Program is to furnish police administrators 
with a measure of their activities and operational problems as 
indicated by the number of reported offenses, arrests, clearances, 
etc . 

A first step in the control of crime is to ascertain the true 
dimensions of the problem. However, present statistics as gathered 
by the UCR Program measure neither the real incidence of crime or the 
full amount of economic loss to victims. Information regarding number 
of offenses, clearances, value and type of property stolen and 
recovered property are collected only for the eight Part I offenses. 
For Part II offenses the only information submitted is the number of 
arrests for these crimes. Consequently, there is no record of the 



actual number of these offenses occurring, or is there a calculation 
made for property loss. 

The Crime Index does not explicitly take into account the varying 
degrees of seriousness of its seven components (excluding arson) . 
Each crime receives the same weight as it is added to the index, 
consequently, an auto theft is counted the same as a murder and an 
aggravated assault is weighed equally with an attempted breaking or 
entering. Any review of crime must consider the volume, rate and 
trend of each offense that comprises the index and the relationship 
between these seven crimes*. 

The Maryland and National Uniform Crime Reporting Programs are 
designed to measure offenses committed and persons arrested. 
Difficulties can arise if this distinction is not kept clearly in 
mind. Crimes relate to events, arrests relate to persons. Unlike 
traffic violations where there is usually one event, violation and 
offender, a single criminal act can involve several crimes, offenders 
and victims. Relating specific crimes to a criminal or offense to 
evaluate characteristics of those arrested, is generally beyond the 
scope of the present Uniform Crime Reporting System. 

Juvenile crime and arrest statistics, because of their nature, are 
another area of misunderstanding. Many juvenile offenders are handled 
informally, as a consequence, inaccurate or incomplete recording of 
the event or action may result. Procedures for handling juveniles 
vary between departments more so than the handling of adult offenders. 
Furthermore, the degree of juvenile involvement in cleared offenses 
is probably seriously misunderstood because the juvenile clearance 
indicator is recorded only when juveniles are exclusively involved. 
When both adults and juveniles are subjects in a clearance, the 
juvenile participation is not reported. 

The preceding comments should not be viewed as an indictment of the 
Uniform Crime Reporting Program which, admittedly, is designed for the 
operational requirements of law enforcement agencies. While the 
current method of gathering and reporting crime and arrest data 
provide a less than complete picture of criminality in our society, 
the FBI has designed the National Incident Based Reporting System to 
address these limitations. 



: Arson is not used at this time in computing the Crime Index 



CRIME FACTORS 



Statistics compiled under the Uniform Crime Reporting Program from 
data submitted by Maryland law enforcement agencies projects a 
statewide view of crime. Awareness of the presence of certain crime 
factors which may influence the resulting volume and type of 
statistics presented is necessary if fair and equitable conclusions 
are to be drawn. These crime influencing factors are present to some 
degree in every community. Their presence affects in varying degrees 
the crime experience of that community. Attempts at comparison of 
crime figures between communities should not be made without first 
considering the individual factors present in each community. 

Crime, as an outgrowth of society, remains a social problem of grave 
concern. The police are limited in their role to its suppression and 
detection. As stated by the President's Commission on Law 
Enforcement and Administration of Criminal Justice in their report 
"The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society" (1967 - Page 92) : 

"But the fact that the police deal daily with crime does 
not mean that they have unlimited power to prevent it, or 
reduce it, or deter it. The police did not create and 
cannot resolve the social conditions that stimulate 
crime. They did not start and cannot stop the convulsive 
social changes that are taking place in America. They do 
not enact the laws that they are required to enforce, nor 
do they dispose of the criminals they arrest. The police 
are only one part of the criminal justice system; the 
criminal justice system is only one part of the 
government; and the government is only one part of 
society. In so far as crime is a social phenomenon, 
crime prevention is the responsibility of every part of 
society. The criminal process is limited to case by case 
operations, one criminal or one crime at a time." 

Listed below are some of the conditions which affect the type and 
volume of crime that occurs from place to place: 

Density and size of the community population 
and the metropolitan area of which it is a 
part . 

Composition of the population with particular 
reference to age, sex and race. 

Economic status of the population. 



Relative stability of the population including 
number and ratio of seasonal visitors/ 
residents, commuters and other transients. 

Climate and seasonal weather conditions. 

Educational, recreational and religious 
characteristics . 

Standards governing appointments to the police 
force . 

Policies of the prosecuting officials and the 
courts . 

Attitude of the public toward law enforcement 
problems . 

The administrative and investigative efficiency 
of the local law enforcement agency, including 
the degree of adherence to crime reporting 
standards . 

Organization and cooperation of adjoining and 
overlapping police jurisdictions. 



CRIME INDEX OFFENSES 

The crime counts listed in this publication are actual offenses 
established by police investigation. When police receive a complaint 
of a crime and the follow-up investigation discloses no crime 
occurred, it is "unfounded". In 2006, police investigations that were 
"unfounded" represented 3 percent of the complaints concerning index 
offenses. When comparing individual index offenses to the number 
reported, "unfounded" offenses ranged from 1 percent in the aggravated 
assault category to 22 percent in the rape category. In 2005, there 
was less than 1 percent "unfounded" in the aggravated assault category 
and 22 percent in the rape category. 

A total of 233,590 actual Index Offenses were reported to law 
enforcement agencies in Maryland during the calendar year 2006. This 
represents a decrease of 2 percent when compared to the 2005 total of 
237,843 Crime Index Offenses. 

An analysis of Index Offenses by month in 2006 shows that August had 
the highest frequency of occurrence and February had the lowest, the 
same as in 2 005. 

The Crime Index Offenses represent the most common problem to law 
enforcement. They are serious crimes by their nature, volume, or 
frequency of occurrence. They are categorized as Violent Crimes, 
which includes Murder, Forcible Rape, Robbery and Aggravated Assault, 
or as Property Crimes which includes Breaking or Entering, Larceny- 
Theft and Motor Vehicle Theft. 

VIOLENT CRIME 

Violent Crimes involve the element of personal confrontation between 
the perpetrator and the victim; consequently, they are considered more 
serious than Property Crimes because of their very nature. These 
offenses accounted for 16 percent of the total Crime Index for 2006. 
In 2005 Violent Crimes made up 17 percent of the Crime Index Total. 
Violent Crime decreased 3 percent compared to 2005. 

Analyzing the Violent Crimes by month reveals July had the greatest 
frequency of occurrence, while February had the lowest, the same as in 
2005. 

PROPERTY CRIMES 

The number of Property Crimes reported during 2006, was more than 5 
times greater than the number of Violent Crimes reported. As a group, 
Property Crimes made up 84 percent of the total Crime Index in 2006. 
In 2005 Property Crimes made up 83 percent of the Crime Index Total. 
Property Crime decreased 2 percent compared to 2005. A monthly 
analysis showed August had the highest frequency of occurrence and 
February the lowest, the same as in 2005. 



RATES 

Crime Rates relate the incidence of crime to the resident population. 
Many other factors which may contribute to the volume and type of 
crime in a given jurisdiction are not incorporated here, but are shown 
in the section entitled "Crime Factors". 

In 2006, the Crime Rate for Maryland was 4,159.6 victims for every 
100,000 population. This represents a 2 percent decrease in the Crime 
Rate when compared to the 2005 rate of 4,246.9. 

The 2006 Crime Rate for the Violent Crime group was 678.6 victims per 
100,000 inhabitants, a 3 percent decrease compared with the 2005 rate 
of 703.0. The Property Crime group had a rate of 3,480.9 victims, a 
2 percent decrease when compared to the 2005 rate of 3,543.9. 



CLEARANCES 

For Uniform Crime Reporting purposes, a crime is cleared when police 
have identified the offender, have evidence to charge him and actually 
take him into custody. Solutions of crimes are also recorded in 
exceptional instances where some element beyond police control 
precludes formal charges against the offender, such as the victim's 
refusal to prosecute or local prosecution is declined because the 
subject is being prosecuted elsewhere for a crime committed in another 
jurisdiction. The arrest of one person can clear several crimes or 
several persons may be arrested in the process of solving one crime. 

Maryland Law Enforcement Agencies cleared 24 percent of all Index 
Offenses reported to them in 2006. In 2005, 23 percent of all Index 
Offenses reported were cleared. 

The Violent Crimes recorded a 55 percent clearance rate in 2006, 
compared to a 50 percent clearance rate in 2005. The Property Crime 
group experienced an 18 percent clearance rate in 2006 the same as in 
2005. 

Considered individually the 2006 Violent Crime clearance rate was 
determined to be 58 percent of the Murders, 58 percent of the Rapes, 
33 percent of the Robberies and 70 percent of the Aggravated Assaults. 
The Property Crime clearance rates were 18 percent for Breaking or 
Entering, 20 percent for Larceny-Theft and 12 percent for Motor 
Vehicle Theft. 

The relatively high clearance rate for Violent Crimes as compared to 
Non-Violent Property Crimes is in part attributable to the volume 
difference between the two. Property Crime volume is much greater 
than that of Violent Crime and police investigation of Violent Crime 
is usually more intense. While the element of direct contact between 
the victim and perpetrator, as well as witness identification also 
contributes to this higher rate of solution for Violent Crime, stealth 
is involved to a greater degree in the Property Crime. 



10 



JUVENILE CLEARANCES 

A juvenile clearance is the clearance of an offense in which all of 
the offenders involved were under the age of 18. If even one of the 
offenders was over 17 years of age, the clearance of that offense is 
not considered a juvenile clearance. In 2006, such juvenile 
clearances represented 20 percent of all clearances, the same as in 
2005. 

Juvenile clearances in the Violent Crime category represented 15 
percent of the total cleared compared to 16 percent in 2005. The 
clearances in Violent Crimes are: Homicide 5 percent, Rape 8 percent, 
Robbery 24 percent and Aggravated Assault 13 percent. 

In the Property Crime category, clearances involving Juvenile 
offenders represented 23 percent of the total cases cleared in 2006, 
the same as in 2005. The clearances in Property crimes are: Burglary 
22 percent, Larceny-Theft 23 percent and Motor Vehicle Theft 27 
percent . 



STOLEN PROPERTY VALUE 

The total value of Property Stolen during 2006 was $359,902,015 which 
represents a 4 percent decrease from 2005. Recovered Property 
amounted to $146,783,053 which is 41 percent of the total stolen, 
resulting in a $213,118,962 property loss to victims in the State of 
Maryland during 2006. This property loss represents an increase of 
12 percent when compared to the property loss in 2005. 

5 YEAR TREND 



5 YEAR 
AVERAGE 


2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


Stolen 365 
Recovered 164 


360 
147 


377 
187 


349 
162 


383 
162 


357 
164 



Value in Millions 



11 



MURDER 



MURDER 



Murder and non-negligent manslaughter is the willful (non-negligent) 
killing of one human being by another. 

VOLUME AND RATE 

During 2 006, a total of 547 murders were reported, this represents 
a 1 percent decrease over 2005. Murder accounted for 1.4 percent of 
all violent crime and .2 percent of the crime index. In 2006, there 
were 9.7 murders per 100,000 population. 

ANALYSIS OF MURDER 

In 2006, 316 murders were cleared with 5 percent of these clearances 
involving only juvenile offenders. A total of 322 persons were 
arrested for murder during 2006. A breakdown of persons arrested 
for murder was 94 percent male, 6 percent female, 13 percent 
juvenile, 80 percent black, 20 percent white and less than 1 percent 
consisting of American Indian and Asian. 

During 2006, 259 of the murder victims were in the 18 to 29 age 
group representing 47 percent of the total. 

Handguns were used in 68 percent of the reported murders in 2006. 
This represents a 6 percent decrease in their use when compared to 
the handgun use in 2 005. 

The next most used weapon was a knife accounting for 13 percent of 
the reported murders in 2006. This represents a 9 percent increase 
when compared to 2005. 

Drug related murders accounted for 2 percent of the total, the same 
as in 2005. 

Family members as offenders in murder accounted for 8 percent while 
boyfriend or girlfriend (those not cohabitating) reflects less than 
1 percent of the total reported. There was an 8 percent increase in 
family related murders while boyfriend or girlfriend murders 
increased 33 percent. Additionally, an acquaintance is listed in 13 
percent of the murders reported in 2006. Strangers and unknown 
relationships accounted for two other large categories, 29 percent 
and 63 percent respectively. 

In 44 percent of the murders, the offenders are unknown and not 
described. When the race of the victim and offender is known the 
offender is most often someone of the same race. 



14 



VICTIM, DESCRIBED OFFENDER 
RACK RELATIONS 



VICTIM 


TOTAL 


DESCRIBED 


SAME RACE 


PERCENT 




MURDERS 


OFFENDER 


OFFENDER 


DISTRIBUTION 


White 


94 


65 


36 


■■A/< 


Black 


436 


226 


175 


77% 


Asian 


6 


4 


1 


25% 


American 
Indian 


1 


1 





N/A 


Unknown 


10 








N/A 



MURDER 

Total Number of Murders 



700 -i 








n 




j-i 


n n 






n n n n 








400- 
300- 
200 
100- 

o- 


n n n 


n 


[miff " " ftrm ■ " 




L . . 




f - - 




I 





14.0 
12.0 
10.0 
8.0 
6.0 
4.0 
2.0 
0.0 



MURDER RATE 

Murder Rate per 100,000 Population 






1975 



1985 



1990 



1995 



2000 



15 



Murder by County 





2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


5 Year 
Average 


Allegany 


1 


1 





1 





1 


Anne Arundel 


23 


16 


16 


24 


17 


19 


Baltimore 


35 


40 


29 


31 


29 


33 


Baltimore City 


276 


269 


276 


270 


253 


269 


Calvert 


1 


2 


1 


3 





1 


Caroline 





1 








3 


1 


Carroll 


1 


2 





2 


5 


2 


Cecil 


4 


4 


2 


4 


1 


3 


Charles 


4 


4 


5 


4 


6 


5 


Dorchester 


1 





3 


2 


4 


2 


Frederick 


9 


1 


1 


5 


5 


4 


Garrett 


2 





1 








1 


Harford 


9 


2 


3 


5 


5 


5 


Howard 


5 


4 


1 


7 


7 


5 


Kent 





1 














Montgomery 


19 


21 


18 


23 


32 


23 


Prince George's 


130 


164 


146 


135 


141 


143 


Queen Anne's 





1 


1 











St. Mary's 


5 


1 


3 


1 


3 


3 


Somerset 


2 


1 


1 


2 


2 


2 


Talbot 





3 


1 


2 


1 


1 


Washington 


4 


4 


5 


1 


6 


4 


Wicomico 


8 


4 


5 


1 


5 


5 


Worcester 


2 


2 








2 


1 


* Statewide Agencies 


6 


4 


3 


2 


1 


3 


1 State Total 


547 


552 


521 


525 


528 


535 



Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence. 



16 



in 10 














O < 




H 








H 


^ 


w 










in id 


° 5 


o o 





o o 
o o 



o o 
o o 



O rt 

o o 



01 01 

o o 



O O rH 

O O rH 



o o 
o o 



o o 
o o 



o o 
o o 



01 rH 

o o 



5 CD 

J o 



x o 

>< -< 

a < 



X u 



X 



o o 



t- r- t *r 01 01 



O " b- < 



O rH TT 



O O 
O O 



a s 



H co 

So; 



O O O rH 



fc < • ■ 

O H 10 o\ 
O 






o o o o o o 



o o 
o o 



5S2 



Is 



HH rH O 



l " 



17 






o o 
o o 



o o 



o o 
o o 



o o 

o o 



o o o o 



o, a. n Di cu 



►J H 
n E-" 



3 



"1 



o in 

O rH 
U3 U> 



§: 



■^ y w 
< o o 



§ : 

o « 

OU * 



18 



gg 



oo i/irH in r- o -h m in in r-i 

oo oo oo oo oo oo 



Ort .-10 or- oh 

OO OO rHO OO 






g a 



O O .-I rH 



O tu, 
pu O 

5 o 



52 i 



a; 

U M 



r- r- 
o o 



o in 
o o 



o o .n 



*£> r- 
o o 



o o o o 



5qq 

D O O 

£X >-i m 

O x. a. 



o in * J 

h * W 

a o * a 

en f- « J 

2 * H 

ss : i 

< U * 

3 « * ,j 

W > * J 



i s 

8 § 



5 

2 

O 

i £ 

8 £ 



19 



o o 



D 

OOO 



o o o m 

O rH 



o o o i- o <r o 
o o o o o o o 



or-r~ooocno 



inor^r~ooor-oi/ior^ 
ooinrHooOr-iooocr. 



o o 



o o o o o o 



OOOCNOOOO 
OOOfNOOO^- 



«g 



OOt-OOOVOOr-JOtfl Mh 



2§ 



o o o in 



<J- o o o 



r- o •» 

O O f\l 



O O r- O CN O i-< 

o o ^r o o o o 



H J H # # # * 



§ 3 



lO o o o vo o 



o o o r- 



I s g 3 U < X 
' w w J w w 



g s I s i 

W H S*i « 2 2 
H f- U U < < . 

£555" 



a a 



S 1 1 1 IS 



j g j g j g < 

gu.gu.gu.JcaJJ 2 

a a a 3 

W Ul * M 2 2 i-" ■ M in 0i O 

HHUU39E-HE-Htd2 

XXJJc/iuippppE-'g 



W 2 Q 

E-> 3 W 

ui a w m mx 

j j j I m to i- 

gu.gu.gu,,JcDiJJ 

a a, a 
H H U O 

££55 

3 3 en co < < £ 



a 5 



5 g 



Si" 13 

5 S a 



ifiooooo<ncooo< 
rooooootNOom2 



oor^ooonoor^<vx> 



r^oooooooooo 



* n 



rtMooooofNinoooco 
inn^ooo^rcnoMrtO 



iHinoooojooinirirH 
mtNjoooio^-OMMco 



ooooooooovo 

OOOOOOOOOVO 



o o o -a- cr\ o i-i 



SI 



O O O O O O rH 



8 H 



< "i-HromooOi-i^ 
H S 

O O-yl^OOOVDi-l 



< ^LTlfNVDOOOU>mOrn 

H £ 

O inCM*£>OOOM)r*10ri-) 



.-I M O .H O VO 



ooor-nOTTO 



s§ * 



n§ 



O O O .H rH O 



§ g 



ui w w 

J J J K ^ CO 

W<UJ<U]rf3CJ<S: 



s: j s: < 

U < Id U J 

' J CD J J 2 

a a, a 3 



E-i E- O _ 

nn<<ni-ijjjj3: 



S Siiil 



U] 2D 

Ul W U] i-i i-i X 

gfcgu.gu.jmJj 2 
a a a 3 

WWXM22M ■ w i-i OJ O 
HHUu22e-E-iE-iHU]2 
MM«f<nMjJJJx2 

acacJjcocoppppE-'g 
33cacD<<£lg£oP 



J g J g J g < 

gu.gu,gUiJCOJJ 2 

a a a 3 

WUl^I.iggi-' -i-hi-hKO 
E-HUUSSt-f-HHug 

M,-rt<ci-ii-ijjjji2 

XXJjLOCOpPPPHg 

33taco<<g£gsoS 



& a - 



2 a £ i 



i-i UJ 

X u. 



20 



<ooooooooooo 

ZOOOOOOOOOOO 



oooooooooooo 
oooooooooooo 



<ooooooooooo 

ZOOOOOOOOOOO 



o o 

CM (N 



388 



oooooooooooo 
oooooooooooo 



oooooooooooo 
oooooooooooo 



oooooooooooo 
oooooooooooo 



ooooooooooo 03 



oooooooooooo u 



rHOOOOOOOOOOO 



B-- 



"< MOOOOOOOOOOOO 

3h j 

hO ^OOOOOOOOOOOO 



8 3 



OOOOOOOOOOO 
OOOOOOOOOOO 



oooooooooooo 
oooooooooooo 



OOOOOOOrHOOOO 



OOOOOOO-HOOOO 



OOOOOOOOOOOO 



U ZQ 

H 2 03 

03 03 03 i-i i-( x 

j j j s !<: to h 
03g03g03g3u<£ 

«fO3<03<WO3JO303 
£U.S&-gU.JCOJJ Z 

o. a. a, 3 

03 03 M « Z Z n • w w « O 
HHUU3<E-HE-HMZ 

ssaim<<S£S£o5 



Sis 



oooor^oooooo< 

OOOO^DOOOOOOZ 



< HOOkOOkDOOflOOO 

H h 

O HOOVDOVDOOmOOO 



HOOrHOi-HOOCNOOOfM 



s: 



O CN o m O O rH 



03 Z Q 

H 2 03 

01 03 03 i-i i-i X 

j j j x y, w n 

J g J g J 5? < 

<03<03<0303joi03 

go,go.go.,JcQ.4,j 



Z Q 

2 oi 



si 



s g 



03 03 * * Z Z i-i • H 
f-.f-UU<2HHB. 

Hl-HrfrflHl-lJJJJ 

33DQCD<<£S£So5 

Is 

1-1 1-1 rH .-H CM O 

OS Q 03 • 

w z ~3 a. o, 

2""g 



O O O O O O 
O O O O O o 



oooooooooooo 
oooooooooooo 



O O CM O O O 






o o 
o o 



o o 

o o 



~ H J J J X * Ol ~i 

a- <03<oi<o303Juo3 

WHfiKgu.gu.jaiJJ z 

S 2 a a c 3 

Z2o303:*::*:z3'--' ■ H " « o 

£ h 5 5 5 3 « ^ " 

o M33in(a<< 



J J J I 



h " a; a < ■ 

u « w z g a. o, 

£• H £ w oi 

> h 2 0. 

03 tloooooooooooo 

Oh 

Z MOOOOOOOOOOOO 

J ",*><»,*>#*l*>,*l*l#>.»>#*l 

< hOOOOOOOOOOOO 

H h 

O HOOOOOOOOOOOO 

(-i HOOOOOOOOOOOO 

§ 5 

8 H 

< "oonovoooooooo 

£-2 

O oomovoooooooo 



CNOCNOflOOi-HO 



SB 



O i-H O O 



s§ 



b: 



w z o 

E- 2 til 

01 03 W i-H i-i X 

J J P X I>S 03 i-h 

J g J g -H g < 

<03<03<0303.J0303 

gu.gu,gu,jmjj 
uw^^zzi-i ■ w m g 

HHCJU22BHE-'e-'03 

I-H1-H<<1-HI-HJJJJI 

xxPjo303ppppE-' 

33CBCQ<<gfeggo 



J J J X « 03 i-l 

3i3g"3g 3 ^ <5: 

<O3<03<O303,JO3O3 

gu.gu.gu.jaijj z 
ex a a. 3 

B M il i: 2 2 h • h i-i OS o 
E->HUU22e-'E-'E-iE-'03Z 

l-ll-HrfrfHHh-lJJJJKS 

XXPJ0103pp3pE-iZ 
33mO]<<ggggOP 



IS 



S g S S 3 i 

< 03 < 03 < 03 

g o< g a. g o, 

03 113 M X Z 3 

H H t_j t_) 2 < 

I I J 5 03 03 

3 3 03 CD < < 



3 U < £ 



03 5 



J J J J I 



I s § § 



H 3 I 



h a ? 



3 §£" h 



21 



RAPE 



RAPE 



Forcible rape is defined as the carnal knowledge of a female 
forcibly and against her will. 



VOLUME AND RATE 

During 2006, 1,178 actual forcible rapes were reported, this 
represents a 7 percent decrease over 2005. Rape accounted for 3 
percent of the violent crime and .5 percent of the crime index. In 
2006, there were 21.0 forcible rapes per 100,000 population. 



ANALYSIS OF RAPE 

Rape by force accounted for 89 percent of all forcible rapes and 
11 percent were attempt to rape. 

In 2006, 688 forcible rapes were cleared with 8 percent of these 
clearances involving only juvenile offenders. 

A total of 404 persons were arrested for forcible rape during 2006. 
A breakdown of persons arrested for forcible rape was, 15 percent 
juvenile, 57 percent black and 43 percent white and less than 1 
percent consisting of American Indian and Asian. 



5 YEAR TREND 





OFFENSES & CRIME RATE* 








5 Year 














Average 


2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


Force 


1, 137 


1,047 


1, 118 


1, 141 


1, 185 


1, 193 


Attempt 


160 


131 


148 


175 


173 


171 


Total 


1,296 


1,178 


1,266 


1,316 


1,358 


1,364 


Crime rate 


24 


21 


23 


24 


25 


25 



: Rapes per 100,000 population 



24 



RAPE 



Total Numbei 


■ of Rapes 




■ n n _ 




1 PI 


1,000 --- _ 


_._■_/_. 


! I I I I I I I '! I I I I I I 


i i i i i i i i i i T i it i 1 i 



1975 1980 



2000 2005 



Rape Rate per 100,000 Population 


50.0 


n n r 




r~ 




n n n 






0.0 i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i 


I I I I I l I I I i I I l I I ! 4 



1975 1980 



25 



Rape by County 





2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


5 Year 
Average 


Allegany 


29 


30 


23 


22 


26 


26 


Anne Arundel 


110 


88 


110 


93 


94 


99 


Baltimore 


143 


178 


198 


210 


236 


193 


Baltimore City 


139 


162 


182 


208 


179 


174 


Calvert 


6 


15 


10 


9 


23 


13 


Caroline 


7 


7 


12 


9 


13 


10 


Carroll 


24 


29 


47 


42 


31 


35 


Cecil 


7 


11 


18 


16 


15 


13 


Charles 


24 


35 


32 


38 


41 


34 


Dorchester 


7 


9 


10 


12 


11 


10 


Frederick 


35 


30 


39 


42 


50 


39 


Garrett 


7 


4 





7 


2 


4 


Harford 


36 


30 


45 


46 


45 


40 


Howard 


42 


42 


40 


46 


38 


42 


Kent 


2 


4 


3 


7 


8 


5 


Montgomery 


145 


157 


149 


148 


145 


149 


Prince George's 


287 


305 


293 


287 


274 


289 


Queen Anne's 


4 


15 


5 


6 


7 


7 


St. Mary's 


15 


24 


12 


14 


16 


16 


Somerset 


4 


3 


9 


7 


12 


7 


Talbot 


9 


10 


9 


10 


8 


9 


Washington 


28 


18 


17 


23 


29 


23 


Wicomico 


45 


34 


32 


32 


42 


37 


Worcester 


20 


25 


21 


23 


18 


21 


* Statewide Agencies 


3 


1 





1 


1 


1 


State Total 


1,178 


1,266 


1,316 


1,358 


1,364 


1,296 



Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence. 



26 



ROBBERY 



ROBBERY 



Robbery is the taking or attempting to take anything of value from 
the care, custody, or control of a person or persons by force or 
threat of force or violence and/or by putting the victim in fear. 

VOLUME AND RATES 

During 2006, there were 14,375 robbery offenses reported, this 
represents less than 1 percent decrease over 2005. Robbery 
accounted for 38 percent of the violent crime and 6 percent of the 
crime index. In 2006, there were 256.0 robberies per 100,000 
population. 

ANALYSIS OF ROBBERY 

During 2006, 50 percent of the robberies were committed on the 
street, while only 2 percent were bank robberies. Of the total 
number of robberies committed, firearm accounted for 49 percent 
while robberies committed with no weapon accounted for 3 6 percent 
of the total . 

In 2006, 4,691 robberies were cleared with 24 percent of these 
clearances involving only juvenile offenders. 

A total of 4,292 persons were arrested for robbery during 2006. A 
breakdown of persons arrested for robbery was 92 percent male, 
8 percent female, 42 percent juvenile, 76 percent black, 23 
percent white and 1 percent consisting of American Indian and 
Asian. 



DISTRIBUTION BY NATURE 















Number of 


Percent 


of 


Total 


Classification 


Offenses 


Distribut 


ion 


Value 


Highway 


7,201 


50% 




$7, 660, 087 


Commercial House 


2,669 


19% 




4, 961, 929 


Service Station 


380 


3% 




629, 625 


Convenience Store 


537 


4% 




286,629 


Residence 


2, 147 


15% 




3, 161,721 


Bank 


233 


2% 




942,417 


Miscellaneous 


1,208 


8% 




1,371, 172 


Total 


14 # 375 


100% 




$19,013,580 



28 



ROBBERY 

Total Number of Robbery 



25,000 



20,000 



15,000 



10,000 



5,000 



o "i 1 V V V i i i i i i V i V V i i i i 

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 



Robbery Rate per 100,000 Population 



500.0 



400.0 



300.0 



200.0 



100.0 



0.0 



1975 1980 1985 1 



I l i l l I l l \ 
1995 2000 2005 



29 



Robbery by County 





2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


5 Year 
Average 


Allegany 


37 


15 


27 


31 


22 


26 


Anne Arundel 


943 


865 


767 


753 


754 


816 


Baltimore 


2,090 


1,769 


1,565 


1,611 


1,705 


1,748 


Baltimore City 


4,260 


3,935 


4,085 


4,364 


4,764 


4,282 


Calvert 


12 


26 


13 


16 


17 


17 


Caroline 


18 


17 


10 


10 


22 


15 


Carroll 


56 


36 


48 


39 


50 


46 


Cecil 


102 


79 


60 


54 


43 


68 


Charles 


202 


195 


159 


152 


186 


179 


Dorchester 


32 


43 


15 


23 


28 


28 


Frederick 


181 


148 


177 


118 


148 


154 


Garrett 


3 


1 


2 


1 


1 


2 


Harford 


202 


193 


214 


248 


237 


219 


Howard 


279 


263 


224 


225 


218 


242 


Kent 


15 


15 


8 


10 


16 


13 


Montgomery 


1,261 


1,109 


856 


1,076 


977 


1,056 


Prince George's 


4,094 


5,172 


4,100 


4,148 


4,056 


4,314 


Queen Anne's 


11 


15 


13 


15 


14 


14 


St. Mary's 


61 


45 


32 


38 


32 


42 


Somerset 


18 


28 


21 


18 


7 


18 


Talbot 


31 


27 


30 


10 


13 


22 


Washington 


158 


111 


88 


107 


111 


115 


Wicomico 


266 


211 


205 


172 


187 


208 


Worcester 


42 


59 


42 


63 


78 


57 


* Statewide Agencies 


1 


1 








1 


1 


State Total 


14,375 


14,378 


12,761 


13,302 


13,687 


13,701 



Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence. 



30 



AGGRAVATED 
ASSAULT 



AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 



Aggravated assault is an unlawful attack by one person upon another 
for the purpose of inflicting severe or aggravated bodily injury. 

VOLUME AND RATE 

During 2006, a total of 22,011 aggravated assaults were reported, 
this represents a 5 percent decrease over 2005. Aggravated 
assaults accounted for 58 percent of the violent crime category and 
9 percent of the crime index. In 2006, there were 392.0 aggravated 
assaults per 100,000 population. 



There were 62,032 simple assaults reported in 2006 for a total of 
84,043 aggravated and simple assaults. 



ANALYSIS OF ASSAULT 

During 2006, 16 percent of the aggravated assaults were with 
firearms, 24 percent with a knife or cutting instrument, 36 
percent with other weapon and 24 percent with personal weapons; 
hands, fist, feet, etc. 

In 2006, 15,306 aggravated assaults were cleared with 13 percent of 
these clearances involving only juvenile offenders. 

A total of 8,038 persons were arrested for aggravated assault 
during 2006. A breakdown of persons arrested for aggravated assault 
was 78 percent male, 22 percent female, 23 percent juvenile, 54 
percent black, 45 percent white and less than 1 percent consisting 
of American Indian and Asian. 

5 YEAR TREND 























5 Year 
















Average 


2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


Firearm 


3,531 


3, 541 


3, 627 


3,389 


3,352 


3, 744 


Knife 




5,234 


5,320 


5,415 


5, 176 


4, 931 


5,330 


Other 




9,717 


7,838 


8, 701 


10,402 


10, 179 


11,465 


Hands, 


etc . 


5,483 


5,312 


5,430 


5,372 


5, 131 


6, 170 


Total 




23,965 


22,011 


23,173 


24,339 


23,593 


26,709 



32 



AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 



Total Number of Aggravated Assault 




n r 




in n n n 


15,000 n-n- - - -;'- 


- - - 






I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 


I ! '! I ! I ! I' I ! ! r ! I ! 



1985 



2000 2005 



Aggravated Assault Rate per 100,000 Population 



600.0 



500.0 



400.0 



300.0 



200.0 



100.0 



0.0 



1 i r 
1975 1 



1985 1990 



1995 2000 2005 



33 



Aggravated Assault by County 





2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


5 Year 
Average 


Allegany 


215 


214 


275 


208 


187 


220 


Anne Arundel 


2,091 


2,198 


2,403 


2,633 


2,742 


2,413 


Baltimore 


3,445 


3,663 


4,388 


4,356 


4,589 


4,088 


Baltimore City 


6,196 


6,943 


7,199 


6,385 


8,667 


7,078 


Calvert 


238 


188 


204 


292 


331 


251 


Caroline 


124 


130 


124 


126 


152 


131 


Carroll 


293 


333 


320 


321 


305 


314 


Cecil 


377 


380 


351 


381 


357 


369 


Charles 


499 


525 


540 


579 


642 


557 


Dorchester 


141 


122 


109 


113 


169 


131 


Frederick 


527 


557 


656 


675 


691 


621 


Garrett 


51 


57 


52 


38 


41 


48 


Harford 


579 


620 


623 


657 


554 


607 


Howard 


298 


306 


344 


271 


210 


286 


Kent 


59 


69 


47 


61 


66 


60 


Montgomery 


879 


909 


1,037 


1,015 


950 


958 


Prince George's 


3,970 


3,856 


3,649 


3,439 


4,007 


3,784 


Queen Anne's 


113 


41 


59 


145 


160 


104 


St. Mary's 


239 


290 


261 


268 


325 


277 


Somerset 


103 


92 


104 


109 


97 


101 


Talbot 


76 


83 


99 


123 


65 


89 


Washington 


378 


388 


426 


360 


327 


376 


Wicomico 


612 


674 


550 


518 


558 


582 


Worcester 


284 


337 


338 


346 


379 


337 


*Statewide Agencies 


224 


198 


181 


174 


138 


183 


State Total 


22,011 


23,173 


24,339 


23,593 


26,709 


23,965 



Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence. 



34 



BREAKING 

OR 
ENTERING 



BREAKING OR ENTERING 



Breaking or entering is defined as the unlawful entry of a struc- 
ture to commit a felony or a theft. 

VOLUME AND RATE 

During 2006, a total of 37,457 breaking or entering ' s were 
reported, this represents a 4 percent increase over 2005. Breaking 
or entering accounted for 19 percent of the property crime category 
and 16 percent of the crime index. In 2006, there were 667.0 
breaking or entering offenses per 100,000 population. 

ANALYSIS OF BREAKING OR ENTERING 

During 2006, 67 percent of the breaking or entering offenses 
involved forcible entry, 23 percent were unlawful entry without 
force and 10 percent were recorded as attempted forcible entry. 
Residential offenses accounted for 68 percent of the total offenses 
while 32 percent were non residential . The average dollar value 
loss was $ 1, 627. 00 . 

In 2006, 6,679 breaking or entering offenses were cleared with 
22 percent of these clearances involving only juvenile offenders. 

A total of 7,618 persons were arrested for breaking or entering 
during 2006. A breakdown of persons arrested for breaking or 
entering was 86 percent male, 14 percent female, 36 percent 
juvenile, 47 percent black, 52 percent white and 1 percent 
consisting of American Indian and Asian. 

PLACE AND TIME OF OCCURRENCE 



Classification 






Number of 
Offenses 


Percent 
Distribution 


Total Value 


Residence Total 








25,502 


68% 


$ 


43,337,633 


Night 6 P.M. -6 


A 


M. 




6, 003 


16% 




7, 890, 617 


Day 6 A.M. -6 


P 


M. 




10,600 


28% 




18, 818, 622 


Unknown 








8,899 


24% 




16, 628, 394 


Non Residence 








11,955 


32% 


$ 


17,597,513 


Night 6 P.M. -6 


A 


M. 




5, 088 


14% 




6, 936,285 


Day 6 A.M. -6 


P 


.M. 




2, 001 


5% 




2, 914, 165 


Unknown 








4, 866 


13% 




7, 747, 063 


Grand Total 








37,457 


100% 


$ 


60,935,146 



36 



BREAKING OR ENTERING 

Total Number of Breaking or Entenngs 



80,000 

70,000 

60,000 

50,000 

40,000 

30,000 

20,000 ■ 

10,000 



i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ii i i i i i i i i i i r 

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 



Breaking or Entering Rate per 100,000 Population 



2,000.0 



1,500.0 



1,000.0 



500.0 



0.0— r 

1975 



1980 



1 \ I I 
1985 



i i i i n i r ! i r 

1990 1995 2000 



2005 



37 



Breaking or Entering by County 





2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


5 Year 
Average 


Allegany 


542 


460 


488 


555 


487 


506 


Anne Arundel 


3,420 


3,122 


2,986 


3,107 


3,191 


3,165 


Baltimore 


4,812 


4,629 


4,942 


5,425 


5,719 


5,105 


Baltimore City 


7,664 


7,388 


8,022 


7,855 


8,814 


7,949 


Calvert 


295 


343 


289 


336 


292 


311 


Caroline 


291 


248 


204 


209 


200 


230 


Carroll 


562 


522 


456 


526 


527 


519 


Cecil 


884 


836 


753 


731 


614 


764 


Charles 


714 


654 


778 


709 


698 


711 


Dorchester 


338 


229 


261 


197 


220 


249 


Frederick 


872 


672 


657 


765 


802 


754 


Garrett 


156 


136 


100 


118 


104 


123 


Harford 


990 


961 


1,112 


1,082 


1,150 


1,059 


Howard 


1,324 


1,225 


1,167 


1,158 


1,294 


1,234 


Kent 


125 


87 


140 


77 


117 


109 


Montgomery 


3,932 


3,729 


3,893 


4,273 


3,996 


3,965 


Prince George's 


6,903 


7,445 


7,460 


8,483 


8,561 


7,770 


Queen Anne's 


268 


220 


187 


185 


193 


211 


St. Mary's 


557 


415 


488 


457 


349 


453 


Somerset 


270 


222 


192 


217 


210 


222 


Talbot 


186 


169 


173 


174 


153 


171 


Washington 


786 


702 


699 


683 


759 


726 


Wicomico 


1,130 


1,080 


914 


958 


956 


1,008 


Worcester 


424 


427 


321 


360 


310 


368 


*Statewide Agencies 


12 








1 


5 


4 


State Total 


37,457 


35,921 


36,682 


38,641 


39,721 


37,684 



* Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence. 



38 



LARCENY- 
THEFT 



LARCENY-THEFT 



Larceny-theft is the unlawful taking, carrying, leading, or riding away 
of property from the possession or constructive possession of another. 

VOLUME AND RATE 

During 2006, a total of 127,500 larceny-thefts were reported, this 
represents a decrease of 8 percent over 2005. Larceny-theft accounted 
for 65 percent of the property crime total and 55 percent of the crime 
index. In 2006, there were 2,270.4 larceny-thefts per 100,000 
population. 

ANALYSIS OF LARCENY-THEFT 

Of the total larceny-thefts reported, the highest percentage 24 was theft 
from automobiles. Pocket-picking accounted for the lowest percentage, 
less than 1 percent . 

In 2006, 25,260 larceny-theft offenses were cleared with 23 percent of 
these clearances involving only juvenile offenders. 

A total of 23,444 persons were arrested for larceny-theft during 2006. 
The breakdown of persons arrested for larceny- theft was 64 percent male, 
36 percent female, 32 percent juvenile, 51 percent black, 48 percent 
white and 1 percent consisting of American Indian and Asian. 

Law Enforcement Agencies reported a total value of $88,689,029 stolen in 
larceny-theft offenses. 

NATURE OF LARCENY-THEFTS 



Classification 


Number of 


Percent 


Total 




Offenses 


Distribution 


Value 


Pocket -Pi eking 


545 


0% 


$ 118,157 


Purse Snatching 


965 


1% 


261,673 


Shoplifting 


19,464 


15% 


5, 076,103 


From Auto 


30,237 


24% 


19,213,348 


Auto Parts & Access. 


27, 052 


21% 


8, 888, 022 


Bicycles 


3,668 


3% 


944,474 


From Building 


15, 849 


12% 


17,840,583 


From Coin Operated 


600 


1% 


259,178 


Machines 








All Other 


29,120 


23% 


36, 087,491 


Total 


127,500 


100% 


$ 88,689,029 



40 



LARCENY-THEFT 



Total Number of Larceny-Thefts 




n n n P n 


100,000 
50,000 _..--- - - - . ... - .- ' - '- 

o -'-M-M M 1 ! 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! 


n n n 

i i i i i i i i i i i i i ? t r 



1985 1990 1995 2000 



Larceny-Theft Rate per 100,000 Population 



4,000.0 



3,500.0 



3,000.0 



2,500.0 



2,000.0- - 



1,500.0 



1,000.0 



0.0 







p p p 


nn n n 
P | "n 


p p 


P P 




H P n 














I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I 


i I ! I I I ! I I I I I I I I I ! 



1990 



1995 



2000 



41 



Larceny-Theft by County 





2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


5 Year 
Average 


Allegany 


1,586 


1,531 


1,481 


1,631 


1,557 


1,557 


Anne Arundel 


12,217 


12,288 


12,391 


13,234 


13,501 


12,726 


Baltimore 


18,357 


17,620 


19,019 


19,401 


21,201 


19,120 


Baltimore City 


18,846 


20,132 


21,819 


23,307 


27,301 


22,281 


Calvert 


1,181 


1,188 


954 


982 


853 


1,032 


Caroline 


610 


507 


558 


605 


547 


565 


Carroll 


2,016 


2,085 


1,878 


1,907 


.1,948 


1,967 


Cecil 


1,848 


1,820 


1,940 


1,777 


1,827 


1,842 


Charles 


3,117 


2,989 


2,903 


3,036 


2,906 


2,990 


Dorchester 


901 


840 


799 


758 


810 


822 


Frederick 


2,882 


2,652 


2,861 


2,969 


3,344 


2,942 


Garrett 


346 


312 


320 


396 


367 


348 


Harford 


3,332 


3,591 


3,836 


3,857 


4,477 


3,819 


Howard 


5,180 


5,409 


5,091 


5,148 


5,469 


5,259 


Kent 


249 


194 


211 


196 


281 


226 


Montgomery 


17,466 


16,509 


16,083 


18,468 


19,733 


17,652 


Prince George's 


26,171 


28,457 


27,490 


26,952 


28,114 


27,437 


Queen Anne's 


674 


662 


668 


644 


615 


653 


St. Mary's 


1,662 


1,401 


1,314 


1,289 


1,284 


1,390 


Somerset 


577 


500 


455 


459 


415 


481 


Talbot 


717 


683 


669 


629 


642 


668 


Washington 


2,367 


2,306 


2,138 


2,091 


2,115 


2,203 


Wicomico 


3,026 


2,846 


2,715 


2,407 


2,454 


2,690 


Worcester 


1,794 


1,581 


1,725 


1,798 


1,819 


1,743 


* Statewide Agencies 


378 


380 


468 


428 


494 


430 


State Total 


127,500 


128,483 


129,786 


134,369 


144,074 


132,842 



Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence. 



42 



MOTOR 

VEHICLE 

THEFT 



MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 

Motor vehicle theft is defined as the theft or attempted theft of 
a motor vehicle. 



VOLUME AND RATE 

During 2006, there were 30,522 motor vehicle thefts reported, this 
represents a 10 percent decrease over 2005. In 2006, there were 
543.5 motor vehicle thefts per 100,000 population. 



ANALYSIS OF MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 

During 2006, 73 percent of the motor vehicle thefts were 
automobiles, 2 percent were trucks and buses and 7 percent were 
other motor vehicles. There were 21,935 recovered vehicles 
accounting for 72 percent of the total reported stolen. 

In 2006, 3,606 motor vehicle thefts were cleared with 27 percent of 
these clearances involving only juvenile offenders. 

A total of 4,073 persons were arrested for motor vehicle theft 
during 2006. A breakdown of persons arrested for motor vehicle 
theft was 86 percent male, 14 percent female, 3 9 percent juvenile, 
69 percent black, 30 percent white and 1 percent consisting of 
American Indian and Asian. 

Law Enforcement Agencies reported a total value $204,368,846 
stolen in motor vehicle thefts. The value of recovered motor 
vehicles was $135,007,746, resulting in a loss of $69,361,100. 



5 YEAR TREND 





5 YEAR 














AVERAGE 


2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


Auto 


24,260 


22, 179 


23,403 


24, 676 


25,448 


25, 594 


Truck 


7, 937 


6, 116 


8, 522 


8, 995 


8,441 


7, 610 


Other 


2,351 


2,227 


2, 145 


2, 187 


2, 517 


2,678 


Total 


34,548 


30,522 


34,070 


35,858 


36,406 


35,882 



44 



MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 



Total Number of Motor Vehicle Theft 



40,000 
35,000 
30,000 
25,000 
20,000 
15,000 
10,000^ 
5,000 



f I l I l l 
1985 1990 



I ! I : 
1995 



1 I f 
2000 



2005 



Motor Vehicle Theft Rate per 100,000 Population 



800.0 



700.0 



600.0 



500.0 



400.0 



300.0 - 



200.0 



100.0 



0-0 ■■ ! ■ T 'I 
1975 



I I I 
1990 



r i r i i i i 

1995 2000 



45 



Motor Vehicle Theft by County 





2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


5 Year 
Average 


Allegany 


83 


57 


55 


93 


89 


75 


Anne Arundel 


1,654 


1,524 


1,631 


1,441 


1,484 


1,547 


Baltimore 


3,463 


3,046 


2,936 


3,341 


3,491 


3,255 


Baltimore City 


6,276 


6,232 


6,731 


6,874 


6,572 


6,537 


Calvert 


102 


86 


74 


83 


82 


85 


Caroline 


44 


51 


77 


77 


48 


59 


Carroll 


127 


170 


151 


143 


135 


145 


Cecil 


310 


278 


264 


200 


195 


249 


Charles 


435 


627 


524 


585 


464 


527 


Dorchester 


89 


77 


92 


74 


79 


82 


Frederick 


224 


197 


221 


240 


263 


229 


Garrett 


22 


19 


16 


22 


22 


20 


Harford 


437 


359 


413 


330 


438 


395 


Howard 


656 


544 


598 


682 


619 


620 


Kent 


17 


24 


29 


21 


20 


22 


Montgomery 


2,640 


2,671 


2,730 


3,676 


3,958 


3,135 


Prince George's 


12,944 


17,242 


18,482 


17,628 


16,991 


16,657 


Queen Anne's 


46 


48 


20 


37 


36 


37 


St. Mary's 


177 


142 


107 


127 


133 


137 


Somerset 


37 


27 


26 


39 


24 


31 


Talbot 


35 


26 


36 


27 


15 


28 


Washington 


300 


261 


270 


273 


253 


271 


Wicomico 


258 


205 


185 


144 


198 


198 


Worcester 


106 


101 


92 


93 


93 


97 


*Statewide Agencies 


40 


56 


98 


156 


180 


106 


State Total 


30,522 


34,070 


35,858 


36,406 


35,882 


34,548 



Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence. 



46 



ARSON 



ARSON 



Arson is any willful or malicious burning or attempt to burn, with or 
without intent to defraud, a dwelling house, public building, motor 
vehicle or aircraft, personal property of another, etc. 

VOLUME AND RATE 

During 2006, there were 2,533 arsons reported, this represents a 5 
percent increase over 2005. In 2006, there were 45.1 arsons per 
100,000 population. Structures accounted for 37 percent, mobile 
accounted for 31 percent of the total number of arsons, while other 
property accounted for 32 percent. Residential comprised 50 percent 
of the structures at which arson was directed, with 11 percent of all 
targeted structural property being uninhabited. The estimated value 
of property damage was approximately 15 million dollars. 

In 2006, 446 arsons were cleared with 50 percent of these clearances 
involving only juvenile offenders. 

A total of 571 persons were arrested for arson during 2006. A 
breakdown of persons arrested for arson was 83 percent male, 17 
percent female, 59 percent juvenile, 43 percent black, 56 percent 
white and 1 percent consisting of American Indian and Asian. 



DISTRIBUTION BY TYPE OF PROPERTY 



Classification 



Number of 
Offenses 



Percent 
Distrib 



Average 
Value 



Percent 
Cleared 



TOTAL STRUCTURAL 




937 


37.0 


10,808 


29 % 


Single Occupancy 




303 


12 .0 


19, 531 


31 % 


Residence 












Other Residential 




169 


6.7 


7,668 


28 % 


Storage 




64 


2.5 


15,698 


22 % 


Industrial/Mfg . 




3 


.1 


2, 007 


% 


Other Commercial 




99 


3 .9 


15,468 


27 % 


Community/ Public 




239 


9.4 


1,254 


36 % 


All Other Structures 


60 


2 .4 


1, 190 


5 % 


TOTAL MOBILE 




796 


31.4 


6,205 


9 % 


Motor Vehicle 




764 


30 .2 


6, 138 


8 % 


Other Mobile Prope 


>rty 


32 


1.3 


7, 792 


16 % 


OTHER 




800 


31.6 


407 


13 % 


GRAND TOTAL 




2,533 


100.0 


6,077 


18 % 



48 



ARSON 

Total Number of Arsons 



4,000 
3,500 
3,000 
2,500 
2,000 
1,500 
1,000 
500 





1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f 
1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 



Arson Rate per 


100,000 Population 










40.0— ---------- 


[~l n '■ n n 


0-0 *'i' V V V *i* *r 'i' V V 'i 1 'i 1 ' 


i r "f i i T i i i i T i i i i i 



49 



Arson by County 





2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


5 Year 
Average 


Allegany 


32 


23 


21 


16 


19 


22 


Anne Arundel 


149 


154 


177 


160 


207 


169 


Baltimore 


366 


316 


315 


318 


363 


336 


Baltimore City 


428 


422 


431 


485 


347 


423 


Calvert 


41 


21 


19 


10 


17 


22 


Caroline 


8 


7 


3 


12 


11 


8 


Carroll 


42 


24 


29 


24 


25 


29 


Cecil 


60 


45 


42 


55 


49 


50 


Charles 


39 


28 


74 


44 


45 


46 


Dorchester 


15 


11 


16 


7 


9 


12 


Frederick 


55 


47 


37 


35 


39 


43 


Garrett 


5 


6 


6 


6 


2 


5 


Harford 


71 


47 


41 


52 


49 


52 


Howard 


86 


172 


156 


72 


7 


99 


Kent 


2 





4 


4 


5 


3 


Montgomery 


360 


315 


276 


201 


274 


285 


Prince George's 


376 


485 


514 


466 


574 


483 


Queen Anne's 


20 


11 


14 


12 


11 


14 


Somerset 


15 


10 


11 


5 


41 


16 


St. Mary's 


33 


33 


32 


35 


8 


28 


Talbot 


5 


4 


13 


7 


3 


6 


Washington 


78 


87 


59 


47 


54 


65 


Wicomico 


42 


44 


38 


31 


37 


38 


Worcester 


15 


15 


21 


24 


13 


18 


* Statewide Agencies 


190 


86 


29 


19 


224 


110 


State Total 


2,533 


2,413 


2,378 


2,147 


2,433 


2,381 



* Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence. 



50 



DOMESTIC 
VIOLENCE 



DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 



The Domestic Violence Act of 1994 mandated that all law enforcement 
agencies in Maryland submit copies of their police reports of 
incidences involving domestic violence to the Maryland State Police. 
Through the Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program, a revised 
Battered Spouse data collection form was created. This new form 
allowed for the collection of more data, which is based upon a 
revised definition of a domestic violence incident under the 
guidelines of the Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program. 

Under the Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program the definition 
for a domestic violence incident is considered "An individual who 
has received deliberate physical injury or is in fear of imminent 
deliberate physical injury from a current or former spouse or a 
current or former cohabitant. This includes a homosexual 

relationship. " In addition, a domestic violence incident in the 
Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program is considered to be any 
crime against : 

• A married person living with their spouse. 

• A married person estranged from their spouse. 

• A male and female in an intimate relationship who 
are not married to each other and who are cohabiting 
or had cohabited. 

• Individuals of the same sex in an intimate 
relationship who are cohabiting or had cohabited. 

It should be noted that prior to 1996 the statistical information 
collected was only on assaults to domestic partner and did not 
include same sex in an intimate relationship who are cohabiting or 
had cohabited. The following information gives a more comprehensive 
report that includes statistics based on the revised definition of 
domestic violence including all crimes. 



52 



DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (RIMES 

There are limitations to the information collected which should be 
clearly understood before any conclusions are drawn from the data 
presented in this report. Procedures for handling domestic violence 
crimes vary between law enforcement agencies and counties of 
occurrence . 

The current method of collecting domestic violence information for 
this report provides less than a complete picture. There is at 
present, no other statewide informational system in general use 
gathering these statistics from law enforcement agencies that will 
more accurately perform this task. 

The Baltimore Police Department was unable to provide any 2002 or 
2003 Domestic Violence Statistics to the Maryland Uniform Crime 
Reporting Program due to data conversion. Therefore, there was a 
total of 21,965 domestic violence crimes reported in 2006 as 
compared to 22,092 crimes in 2005, resulting in a .6 percent 
decrease. The breakdown is as follows: 



Crime 



*2002 



*2003 



2004 



2005 



2006 



Homicide 


22 


15 


28 


22 


26 


Rape 


55 


58 


67 


49 


63 


Robbery 


42 


30 


62 


77 


59 


Assaults 


17, 690 


16,699 


21,365 


20,482 


20,249 


Burglary 


87 


68 


112 


96 


100 


Larceny 


139 


88 


99 


108 


83 


Motor Vehicle Theft 


6 


6 


4 


12 


18 


Arson 


7 


6 


7 


4 


7 


Forgery 


13 


8 


8 


7 


6 


Fraud 


4 


8 


2 


4 


9 


Embezzlement 








1 








Malicious Destruction 


136 


130 


202 


179 


152 


of Property 












Illegal Weapons 





1 





3 





Prostitution 











1 


1 


Sex Offenses 


10 


9 


6 


3 


8 


Drug Possession 





1 


1 








Offenses Against 


285 


435 


507 


591 


747 


Family & Children 












Disorderly Conduct 


6 


4 


20 


20 


16 


All Other Offenses 


402 


294 


522 


434 


421 


Total 


18,904 


17,860 


23,013 


22,092 


21,965 



Baltimore Police Department was unable to provide any 2002 and 2003 Domestic Violence statistics 
to the Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program due to data conversion. 



53 



ASSAULTS 

Assault is the most frequent domestic violence incident reported. 
During 2006, there were 20,249 domestic assaults, representing a 
1 percent decrease over 2005 domestic violence assaults. There were 
4,572 domestic assaults reported as aggravated. Aggravated assaults 
were 23 percent of the total reported domestic assaults in 2006. 



*2002 *2003 2004 2005 2006 



Aggravated 



Firearm 


187 


177 


215 


218 


222 


Knife 


811 


763 


1, 023 


922 


946 


Other Weapons 


1,489 


1,412 


2, 034 


1,422 


1,350 


No Weapons 


1,406 


1,381 


2,246 


2, 106 


2, 054 



Non Aggravated 

Simple 13,788 12,959 15,829 15,798 15,637 

Stalking 9 7 18 16 40 



Total 17,690 16,699 21,365 20,482 20,249 

MONTHLY OCCURRENCES 

*2002 *2003 2004 2005 2006 

January- 
February 
March 
April 
May 
June 
July 
August 
September 
October 
November 
December 

Total 18,904 17,860 23,013 22,092 21,965 



1 


564 


1 


494 


1 


933 


1 


745 


1 


726 


1 


384 


1 


150 


1 


777 


1 


520 


1 


642 


1 


638 


1 


576 


1 


882 


1 


946 


1 


766 


1 


546 


1 


418 


1 


905 


2 


010 


1 


840 


1 


602 


1 


458 


2 


071 


1 


948 


1 


875 


1 


669 


1 


626 


1 


839 


1 


985 


1 


950 


1 


765 


1 


615 


2 


075 


2 


099 


2 


006 


1 


708 


1 


530 


2 


116 


1 


926 


2 


148 


1 


636 


1 


604 


1 


955 


1 


750 


1 


759 


1 


469 


1 


509 


1 


847 


1 


794 


1 


922 


1 


482 


1 


403 


1 


750 


1 


693 


1 


666 


1 


441 


1 


477 


1 


863 


1 


676 


1 


665 



* 



Baltimore Police Department was unable to provide any 2002 and 2003 Domestic Violence statistics 
to the Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program due to data conversion. 



54 



HOUR OF DAY 



*2002 *2003 2004 2005 2006 



12 


00 


A.M. 


1 


00 


A.M. 


2 


00 


A.M. 


3 


00 


A.M. 


4 


00 


A.M. 


5 


00 


A.M. 


6 


00 


A.M. 


7 


00 


A.M. 


8 


00 


A.M. 


9 


00 


A.M. 


10 


00 


A.M. 


11 


00 


A.M. 


12 


00 


Noon 


1 


00 


P.M. 


2 


00 


P.M. 


3 


00 


P.M. 


4 


00 


P.M. 


5 


00 


P.M. 


6 


00 


P.M. 


7 


00 


P.M. 


8 


00 


P.M. 


9 


00 


P.M. 


10 


00 


P.M. 


11 


00 


P.M. 



1 


048 


981 


1 


231 


1 


1 07 


1 


194 




947 


890 


1 


340 


1 


192 


1 


225 




806 


725 


1 


086 




926 




922 




506 


506 




776 




701 




720 




383 


352 




511 




451 




487 




301 


249 




371 




356 




415 




243 


277 




407 




363 




430 




355 


375 




497 




480 




474 




445 


475 




653 




597 




785 




524 


534 




680 




732 




839 




648 


631 




746 




765 




839 




771 


733 




794 




822 




832 




754 


675 




815 




851 




855 




800 


663 




756 




740 




793 




695 


651 




797 




874 




839 




838 


706 




813 




902 




909 




856 


825 


1 


,015 




986 




931 




849 


812 


1 


, 057 


1 


, 003 




996 




983 


978 


1 


,224 


1 


, 114 


1 


, 040 


1 


, 146 


982 


1 


,341 


1 


,203 


1 


, 128 


1 


, 165 


1, 114 


1 


,514 


1 


,405 


1 


,263 


1 


,258 


1,244 


1 


,511 


1 


,478 


1 


,287 


1 


,259 


1,262 


1 


,567 


1 


,543 


1 


,374 


1 


,324 


1,220 


1 


,511 


1 


, 501 


1 


,388 



Total 18,904 17,860 23,013 22,092 21,965 



Analysis 

In 2006, 40 percent of all domestic violent crimes occurred between 
the hours of 7:00 P.M. to 1:00 A.M ., inclusive . Thirty-four percent 
of domestic violent crimes occurred during Saturday and Sunday. 
When combining these two categories this would indicate that an 
intensive period for domestic violent crimes occur between 7:00 
P.M. and 1:00 A.M. on Saturday and Sunday. 



* Baltimore Police Department was unable to provide any 2002 and 2003 Domestic Violence statistics 
to the Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program due to data conversion. 



55 



DAY OF WEEK 



Monday 

Tuesday 

Wednesday 

Thursday 

Friday 

Saturday 

Sunday 



*2002 *2003 2004 2005 2006 



2 


494 


2 


321 


3 


043 


3 


004 


3 


072 


2 


524 


2 


270 


2 


844 


2 


957 


2 


985 


2 


281 


2 


372 


2 


850 


2 


669 


2 


831 


2 


382 


2 


088 


2 


981 


2 


797 


2 


711 


2 


569 


2 


407 


3 


157 


2 


853 


2 


811 


3 


140 


3 


052 


3 


816 


3 


834 


3 


572 


3 


514 


3 


350 


4 


322 


3 


978 


3 


983 



Total 18,904 17,860 23,013 22,092 21,965 

VICTIMS 

Sex *2002 *2003 2004 2005 2006 

Female 14,087 13,321 17,459 16,816 16,742 

Male 4,817 4,539 5,554 5,276 5,223 

Total 18,904 17,860 23,013 22,092 21,965 

Race *2002 *2003 2004 2005 2006 



American 


Ind 


ian 


7 




9 


17 


17 


17 


Asian 






186 




190 


171 


188 


197 


Black 






7,517 


7 


092 


11,275 


10,691 


10, 581 


White 






10,627 


9 


957 


11,084 


10, 787 


10,601 


Other 






567 




612 


466 


409 


569 


Total 






18,904 


17 


860 


23,013 


22,092 


21,965 



Age 

Sixty-one percent of the victims of domestic violence are 
between 25 to 44 years of age, inclusive. 



Baltimore Police Department was unable to provide any 2002 and 2003 Domestic Violence statistics 
to the Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program due to data conversion. 



56 



RELATIONSHIPS 

The domestic violence report collects five victim relationships 
either current or former. The breakdown is as follows: 

*2002 *2003 2004 2005 2006 



Husband 


2, 561 


2, 399 


2, 548 


2, 


,398 


2, 374 


Wife 


7, 140 


6, 585 


7,207 


7, 


, 116 


7, 067 


Cohabitant 














Male 


2,211 


2, 080 


2, 872 


2, 


,788 


2,718 


Female 


6, 859 


6, 640 


10, 055 


9, 


,491 


9,453 


Homosexual 


133 


156 


331 




299 


353 


Total 


18,904 


17,860 


23,013 


22, 


,092 


21,965 



HOUSEHOLD STATUS 



*2002 *2003 2004 2005 2006 



Living Together 


14,455 


13, 983 


16, 935 


16,660 


16, 586 


Estranged 


4,236 


3, 659 


5,401 


4, 935 


5, 170 


Unknown 


213 


218 


677 


497 


209 



Total 18,904 17,860 23,013 22,092 21,965 



ALCOHOL AND DRUG INVOLVEMENT 

In domestic violence reporting the use of alcohol, drugs or both by 
either the offender or victim are captured. 

*2002 *2003 2004 2005 2006 



Alcohol 

Drugs 

Alcohol 

None 

Unknown 


& Drugs 


5,436 

214 

177 

9,322 

6, 755 


5,267 

223 

164 

8,220 

3, 986 


5,601 

271 

150 

9,270 

7, 721 


5,478 

308 

172 

9,564 

6,570 


5,451 

221 

150 

8, 982 

7, 161 


Total 




18,904 


17,860 


23,013 


22,092 


21,965 



* Baltimore Police Department was unable to provide any 2002 and 2003 Domestic Violence statistics 
to the Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program due to data conversion. 

57 



CIRCUMSTANCES 



2002 



*2003 



2004 



2005 



2006 



Alcohol 




626 




659 




641 




629 


565 


Drug 




190 




214 




211 




211 


208 


Food or Cooking 




159 




146 




145 




130 


153 


Friends 




182 




187 




170 




188 


156 


Gambling 




13 




7 




7 




12 


7 


Household Chores 




210 




175 




167 




187 


195 


Infidelity 


1 


751 


1 


,578 


1 


646 


1 


648 


1,720 


Job or Lack of Job 




143 




130 




132 




112 


136 


Mental Imbalance 




99 




129 




114 




106 


98 


of Either 




















Money- 




914 




909 




832 




896 


877 


Offspring 


1 


, 158 


1 


, 062 


1 


, 124 


1 


062 


1, 017 


Property- 




830 




802 




841 




75 5 


719 


Relatives 




138 




158 




163 




177 


137 


Sex 




264 




231 




218 




233 


218 


Sports or Hobby 




9 




8 




14 




8 


11 


Television 




60 




70 




64 




55 


61 


Separation 




642 




614 




627 




551 


535 


Divorce 




147 




168 




168 




149 


171 


Reconciliation 




51 




63 




60 




63 


43 


Staying Out Late 




457 




413 




378 




372 


334 


Other 


4 


,400 


4 


, 105 


4 


, 892 


5 


,348 


5,387 


Unknown 


6 


,461 


6 


, 032 


10 


, 399 


9 


,200 


9,217 


Total 


18 


,904 


17 


,860 


23 


,013 


22 


,092 


21,965 



CLEARANCES 

There are two ways of clearing a case. One is by making an arrest 
and charging the person (s) with the offense, the second is known as 
an exceptional clearance. Exceptional clearance means the police 
know the identity and location of the person (s) who committed the 
offense and have enough information to arrest them. However, there 
is some reason beyond their control that prevents them from making 
the arrest. 

The arrest and exceptional clearances reported reflect the 
disposition at the time the domestic violence report form was 
forwarded to the Uniform Crime Reporting Program. These reports are 
not updated, therefore, other arrests and exceptional clearances may 
occur but would not be reflected in the following totals. 



Baltimore Police Department was unable to provide any 2002 and 2003 Domestic Violence statistics 
to the Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program due to data conversion. 



58 



*2002 



*2003 



2004 



2005 



2006 



Arrest 


7,274 


7,088 


10, 141 


9, 506 


8, 903 


Exceptional 


7,593 


6, 994 


7, 710 


7,411 


8,225 


Unknown 


4, 037 


3,778 


5, 162 


5, 175 


4,837 



Total 



18,904 17,860 23,013 22,092 21,965 



During 2006, 78 percent of all domestic violence cases were cleared. 
A breakdown of the clearances in 2006, were 41 percent by arrest, 37 
percent by exceptional and 22 percent unknown, compared to 43 
percent by arrest, 34 percent by exceptional and 23 percent unknown 

in 2005. 



Domestic Violence 

Number of Domestic Violence Incidences 



25,000 
20,000 
15,000 
10,000 
5,000 



*2002 



*2003 



2004 



2005 



2006 



* Baltimore Police Department was unable to provide any 2002 and 2003 Domestic Violence statistics 
to the Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program due to data conversion. 



59 



COUNTY TOTALS 



*2002 



*2003 



2004 



2005 



2006 



STATE 



18,904 17,860 



23,013 



22,092 



21,965 



REGION I 


2 


097 


2 


061 


1 


913 


1 


931 


2,007 


Caroline Co. 




164 




154 




123 




150 


169 


Cecil Co. 




411 




397 




352 




333 


305 


Dorchester Co. 




175 




207 




146 




181 


196 


Kent Co. 




57 




49 




43 




35 


52 


Queen Anne ' s Co . 




132 




131 




114 




98 


134 


Somerset Co. 




108 




92 




152 




113 


120 


Talbot Co. 




120 




110 




116 




106 


129 


Wicomico Co. 




575 




514 




471 




501 


500 


Worcester Co. 




355 




407 




396 




414 


402 


REGION II 


1 


,862 


1 


,685 


1 


,561 


1 


,595 


1,679 


Calvert Co. 




355 




360 




295 




373 


359 


Charles Co. 




857 




743 




649 




658 


712 


St. Mary's Co. 




650 




582 




617 




564 


608 


REGION III 


2 


,079 


1 


,929 


1 


r 816 


2 


,030 


2,096 


Allegany Co. 




280 




279 




296 




286 


291 


Carroll Co. 




525 




448 




408 




418 


483 


Frederick Co. 




697 




620 




535 




732 


804 


Garrett Co. 




84 




76 




84 




94 


78 


Washington Co. 




493 




506 




493 




500 


440 


REGION IV 


4 


,995 


4 


,640 


4 


,363 


3 


,968 


4,241 


Montgomery Co. 


2 


,027 


2 


, 092 


2 


,005 


1 


,625 


1,559 


Pr. George's Co. 


2 


, 968 


2 


,548 


2 


,358 


2 


,343 


2,682 



REGION V 



7,870 



7,544 13,360 12,568 11,942 



Anne Arundel Co. 


1,501 


1,341 


1 


220 


1 


259 


1 


188 


Baltimore City 


4 


2 


5 


643 


4 


991 


4 


418 


Baltimore Co. 


4, 902 


4, 766 


5 


060 


4 


829 


5 


165 


Harford Co. 


787 


760 




684 




685 




625 


Howard Co . 


676 


675 




753 




804 




546 



STATEWIDE AGENCIES 



* Baltimore Police Department was unable to provide any 2002 and 2003 Domestic Violence statistics 
to the Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program due to data conversion. 



60 



•2 

Pi 5 



dPdP <#><#> 
eon oh 
ro vo o o 



\ • 

So 



\ • 

So 



<o 
-^. • 

£0 



O CN 
O O 



<*> dip 

o o 
o o 



o o 
o o 



o o 
o o 



O (N 

o o 



r- in 



^r in 
in in 



o <N 

o o 



on vd in 



vo as 
o 00 



-J 

< 

o 

H 

u, 
O 
H 

UJ 

U 

UJ 

CO 
UJ 

u 

UJ 

O 

> 

U 

H 
c/3. 
UJ 

§ 

o 

a 

u. 
O 

z 

o 



5g 






vo 

3 J 

■ a 



dPdP 


<*> 


dp 


c*> 


dPdP 


<AP dp 


dP dP 


dP dP 


dP dP 


en H 

vo ro 
cn r- 


\ • 

fco 



<o 

\ • 

So 




<o 

\ • 

So 



CJ 00 

cn 

H00 


ro r- 

n U3 

ro vo 


O O 

in in 
in r- 








(N 00 

00 H 
CTl 



cn r-» cn r- 



ro cn 


r- o> 


rtj ro 


<«< 


< en 


vo ro 


cn <* 


H 


Wo 


\m 


■*v 


in 


cn t-» 




55 


3 


S3 





VO VO mcr. 
f H H 

M00 



<C en < o 



2 



oh o ro 



CftH 
cocn 
inn 


cn co 
H 


< co 
wn 
55 


<C 00 


<:o 

^H 


^< co 
H 










HOO 

00 


ro cn 

H 


< in 
\in 
55 


<H 





cn r> 
vo ro 
co ro 



00 in h en 
(N r~ vo ro 



CN t- 00^ >tf 00 OVO CO CN ID 00 

covo r— cr\ cn cn in cn r-t~~ cn cn 
cn cn Hm h tj<ti}< mr- h o> 



OOJ CT\ ro r~ 

r~ in vo in cn 
^ t in co h 



in in h ro 



in o ro in -* h 
o vo in vo in cn 
ro o in cn h 



r- ro 


H CN 


00 CTl 


co cn 


cn r- 


H VD 


in 


h r- 


H 



cn ro cn rs 
cn h 00 cn 
in co cn 



Sfc £ 



gfa 2 fn Sfc S fa SCu 



2 Cn 2 Pm 



U to 

•H C 

w a) 

•H VH 

CQ 4-J 

(0 O 



•h nJ 

u o 

H H 

h id 

H OJ 4J 

< *0 

•H H 
H O 

10 -H (!) 

■U g ft 

« 

Eh K « 



Q 
ft 

^ (C 
OJ (U 



S H 



3 


oj 
Dl 

c 
ns c 

a o 
ft 

u a) 
<u OJ 
X5 s 



61 



H 

m 


dP o¥> 


o¥> dp 


dP o¥> 


<#> dP 


o¥> oV= 


dP dp 


#> dp 


c*> dP 


<#> dP 


cX> dP 


of> <X> 


df dP 


o 


[- LD 


ro CTl 


O CN 


H ■* 


o n 


O rH 


o o 


H co 


O H 


O rH 


o o 


o o 


Eh 

C 
rfl 


CN CT\ 
CN VO 


r- ro 

r-i IT) 


o o 


o o 


o o 


O O 


o o 


o o 


o o 


o o 


o o 


o o 



























58 

15 



dp dP 




dP dp 

r- ro 


dP OP 




oP o¥> 




<x> <*> 

ro r» 


<X> dP 


<N 00 
H CO 


■=j< in 


in in 
cn t-» 


in in 
cn r- 


in 'S' 
cn r-» 





in cn 


m in 


in in 


m <s< 


cd a\ 


00 CTl 



cm in 
in cti 



cn r- 
ro o\ 



r- cn 

■* ro 
ro o 



a c« 



M 






H 






S 




rH 


2 




m 



u 




4-1 




c 


T3 







CD 




•H 






■U (Q 


rrj 




ro v 


> 




U CO 


m 




-h a 


J-i 




4-1 at 


Cn 




•H «W 


Cn 




CO 4-1 


< 




M O 






(tJ 


c 




rH <4H 







u 


S3 



.c o 

> 



Q> 



62 



O C 

o a) 



id 

■^ o o o o 

o . . . . 

H o o o o 

-a 

C 

a 



dp dp <*><*> 

o o o o 
o o o o 



dp dp dpdp dpdp dpdp dpdp 

r-t m oo oo oo oo 

oo oo oo oo oo 



dpdp 


dPdP 




O rH 


n ko 




O O 


o H 


1 

4> 



-J 

< 

H 

O 
H 
u. 

H 

w 
U 

w 
a. 

CQ 
UJ 

U 

z 

u 

o 
> 
y 

H 

§ 

o 

Q 
-. 
O 



5 I 

«o .1 



dP 


dP 


dP dP 


dPdP 


dPdP 


dPdP 


dPdP 


dPdP 


dPdP 


H 


<J\ 


o o 


o o 


in in 


o o 


in in 


in in 


r- r*> 


H 


00 


o o 


o o 

o 


HOO 


o o 


H 00 
H CO 


cn r- 

H 00 


in *»« 

H 00 



o o O O H 00 



c 
c 



S3 fa 



gfa Sb Sh 



Sfa 2 fa 



S fa 32 fa 



ex 

o 



CQ 
g 

2 

u 

























* 2 
















































c 52 






















^ 


E > 






§ 
















0) 
> 


c3 O 




„ 


•H 
AJ 














AJ 




8* 






n 

.* a) 

U CO 


2 




a 




a> 




u 






a> a 


JJ 




c 




Pi 




C M 


c 


0).® 


■S 2 




43 <D 


a 


Js 







(0 




•h aj ,: 











U *J 


V 


4J 


Pi 


c 


M 




a m £ 


u 


*J *J 


"3 o 




v 


p 


u 


(0 





v 


rH 




o'^ 


a. 3 




TJ U 




9 


0) 




tO 4-) 


(0 


>, 


u 


o *a 




m fa 


a 


p 


£ 


4J 


C Pi 


*J 


H 


^ £ 


o £ 




n 


3 


o 




3 


0) a) 







h 


«> S 4 


& 


0) 





m 


■-I 


4J 


>M CJ 


H 


« 


XI m 


E 2 


» OJ 


■H 


p< 


n) 


-H 


"H X 




T3 


■U .1 


•a & 

■a 2 


a) 


-o H 


O 




Cn 


.U 


ow 


a 


fill 

«w fa K 


U 


On 


05 


3 <d 


•H 


4-1 


9) 


a 




0) 








M 


It) fa 


H 


o 


H 





X 


2 


ra 


r-<5 


CQ CL 





M 


10 




r-i 


to 


V 


-H 


H 




fa 


fa 


s 




H 


fa 


w 


o 


o 


Q 


< 


* 



63 



DOMESTIC VIOLENCE BY COUNTY 





2006 


2005 


2004 


**2003 


**2002 


5 Year 
Average 


Allegany 


291 


286 


296 


279 


280 


286 


Anne Arundel 


1,188 


1,259 


1,220 


1,341 


1,501 


1,302 


Baltimore 


5,165 


4,829 


5,060 


4,766 


4,902 


4,944 


Baltimore City 


4,418 


4,991 


5,643 


2 


4 


3,012 


Calvert 


359 


373 


295 


360 


355 


348 


Caroline 


169 


150 


123 


154 


164 


152 


Carroll 


483 


418 


408 


448 


525 


456 


Cecil 


305 


333 


352 


397 


411 


360 


Charles 


712 


658 


649 


743 


857 


724 


Dorchester 


196 


181 


146 


207 


175 


181 


Frederick 


804 


732 


535 


620 


697 


678 


Garrett 


78 


94 


84 


76 


84 


83 


Harford 


625 


685 


684 


760 


787 


708 


Howard 


546 


804 


753 


675 


676 


691 


Kent 


52 


35 


43 


49 


57 


47 


Montgomery 


1,559 


1,625 


2,005 


2,092 


2,027 


1,862 


Prince George's 


2,682 


2,343 


2,358 


2,548 


2,968 


2,580 


Queen Anne's 


134 


98 


114 


131 


132 


122 


Somerset 


120 


113 


152 


92 


108 


117 


St. Mary's 


608 


564 


617 


582 


650 


604 


Talbot 


129 


106 


116 


110 


120 


116 


Washington 


440 


500 


493 


506 


493 


486 


Wicomico 


500 


501 


471 


514 


575 


512 


Worcester 


402 


414 


396 


407 


355 


395 


* Statewide Agencies 











1 


1 





State Total 


21,965 


22,092 


23,013 


17,860 


18,904 


20,767 



* Statewide agencies report offenses but do not identify county of occurrence. 
**Baltimore Police Department was unable to provide any 2002 and 2003 Domestic Violence 
statistics to the Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program due to data conversion. 



64 



INDEX OFFENSE DATA 

The tables contained within this section were designed to provide 
quick reference to statistical crime information relative to the 
different reporting areas of the State of Maryland. 

The tables are broken down by Region. Within each Region 
information is listed in County name sequence and is further 
detailed to show the activity experienced by individual police 
agencies. The general identifying descriptions which indicate the 
reporting areas are listed and defined as follows: 



Regional Total 



This line indicates the total activity 
of all the Counties within the indicated 
Region. 



County Total 



This line indicates the total activity 
of all reporting Agencies within the 
indicated County. 



Sheriff 



This line indicates the total activity 
reported by Sheriff's Offices. This 
includes activity which may have 
occurred within the corporate limits of 
towns in that County. 



County Police - This line indicates the total activity 
Department reported by County Police Departments. 

This includes activity which may have 
occurred within the corporate limits of 
towns in that County. 



State Police 



This line indicates the total activity 
reported by all State Police 
installations within the indicated 
reporting area. This includes activity 
which may have occurred within the 
corporate limits of towns in that 
County. 



Municipal 

Police 

Departments 



This line indicates the total activity 
reported by the specified police 
departments and includes only those 
crimes which were handled by that 
department . 



65 



There are five regions used in the Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting 
Program which are listed below. 



Region I - Eastern Shore 

Caroline County- 
Cecil County 
Dorchester County 
Kent County 
Queen Anne ' s County 
Somerset County 
Talbot County 
Wicomico County 
Worcester County 

Region II - Southern Maryland 

Calvert County 
Charles County 
St. Mary's County 

Region III - Western Maryland 

Allegany County 
Carroll County 
Frederick County 
Garrett County 
Washington County 

Region IV - Washington Metropolitan 

Montgomery County 
Prince George ' s County 

Region V - Baltimore Metropolitan 

Anne Arundel County 
Baltimore City 
Baltimore County 
Harford County 
Howard County 



Crime Rates for the individual agencies are not calculated in the 
following table because of overlapping jurisdictions in many cities 
of municipal, county and state law enforcement agencies. This 
table contains the offenses as reported by the individual agencies 
with crime rates for the county and region totals. Arson offenses 
are listed opposite the agency reporting the Arson and are not 
computed in the total offenses or crime rates. 



66 



> W 

\ S 

2 H 



r~ o m 

O rH 

in vd o 



<N (N t^ 



o> o\ o 



< < 



o « vo 






r~ oo <T\ 



r- r~ o 



ONI"" 



« 


U Q 


u 


Pi K 




pa j 


« 


a u 


u 




£> 






j 




< Q 




H K 




O J 


.J 


H U 


tH 




(* 


w 


1 


.J 2 


H Pn 




O &< 



67 



O O * [- o 



* r- r- o 



[- r- o 



kd in \d 



o oo tn 



r- in f> 



t» m t-> 



25 

o w 

<c < 



\D O <J> 



< Q 



£ 3 



•& r~ in 



o oo o 



68 



< >H O 

UHft 



>' w 



fN fN O 



m <n o 



gg 



ft O 

O M 

ft. H 



o m o 



fN rH «r 

Lf) fN 

CM fl r- 



VO O r)> 



.H O O 



r~ kc r^ 



H I 



>X> V£> + fN i-i O 



< w 

O fc 
H O 



•5f in c^ 



U> fN rH 



69 



3£ 



«c < 



CN iH cr\ 



CT\ 00 VO 



CN CN O 



CN >3* O 



CN M< a\ 



< Q 

H « 

O J 

H U 



r-i r- <tf 



q 1 r- in 



o a-\ m 

(N o 



a 

a- o 



O 1/1 rH 



70 



00 00 10 



10 m o 









m> o\ •* 

oi *i< 

r-H CN 00 



ITI rH O 



o a\ o 



o a\ o 



cn in o * o o 



,H ,H O 



o o * o o 



H 
U Q 

o- u 



< a 
o J 



o< o 

o M 






in <n r» * 10 



c\ <* rj 



71 



< < 






<N O O 



CN O O 



O I- o 



CN O O 



H O O 



>* in ts 



H 


s 


K 


w 


DU 


:r 


:i: 


•x 


u 


u 




't 


04 


H 


C/l 


W 


s 


i . 



gg 

o u 



H 


, 


►J 


2 




►J 


u 






U 




> 






H 


W 




a 


a, 




H 






2 * 






w u 




J 


vs 






a, a 




* 


Cfl < 



72 



U Q 



a 

tx o 

O M 



r~ t-i in 



> 


w 


|C 






CI 




:i: 








(""J 


:•: 


H 


* 






+ 


s 


h 


I 


CO 


in 


H 


D 


Cfc 




U> 


00 




11; 


w 


* 


H 


H 


O 



in cm o 



VD O 0> 



O « 

o 



5 >h O 

o h a 



73 



> w 



o to 
< < 



<T\ U3 iH * in rH ri 

VO 00 * O CT\ 

H rH O * H n 



U 


u 


Q 


* 


m 


m 




UJ 


J 








c* 


a 


U 








O 






* 






& 






* 








■J 








o 




< 


Q 




o 


■* 




H 


a: 










O 


J 








J 


H 


u 








>H 






* 






i 


J 


CO 

2 


• 


(N 


C\ 


< 






O 


m 




H 


U. 










O 


b 










H 


O 


+ 










iH rH Ul 



74 



H 
h 

> w 

U Pu 



(N O O 



H g 



H 
U Q 

o< CJ 






< u 



75 



CN rH O 

rH rH P- 



5Z 



in O CN 

CT\ O 

■* >£> rH 






in LD CN 



CN rH O 



P4 
U 


U D 


a a 




W rH 


M 


a u 


u 




£ 






J 




< a 




H « 




O J 


J 


H CJ 


>H 




5 


w 




J r3 




< u 




H fa 




O fa 




H O 



<* lti *£> * in r- ch 



fN in 
U) in 



r^ 

a O 

O m 



n > 

rH M 

< 2 



76 



> w 

:•; i • 



u u. 
Oi w 

3£ 



< < 



CM CN O 



41 « o 



VO (N O 



O 0\ C- 



fN ^< 00 

(N rH U) 



r» \o a\ 



vd r- r~ 



H O O 



H O O 



r~ r- o 



O J 
H U 



< W 
O fc 



U> VO U) 

■^ in 

1/1 in + 



77 



in a\ kv 
+ 
in m 



m in o 
m a if 



m m on 
c\j <N r~ 



r- r- o 



o on. o 



t- o o\ 



H O O 



Pi 
a 


H 


D 


* 


00 


n 


^ 


a: 


a 








(N 




w 


j 










a 


a< 


u 










u 














& 






* 










J 








H 


U> 




< 


o 




ON 








H 


3 








in 




O 


j 










J 


H 


u 










>H 






* 








fkj 




en 


* 








3 


J 


25 




o 


CM 


CO 


s 


< 


w 




in 


00 






E< 


fc 


* 


<N 


CM 


(N 



CN <N CN 



CK K 
1) < 

2 CD 



H 


u, 


(U 


h 


w 




> 


a 


►J 


W 


9 


X 


u 


ca 



u 


« 


■z 


u 






V. 


iX 


D, 


w 




n 


a. 


pq 


w 


3 


£ 


u. 



78 



55 H 
U U< 

SI 



l£> VO IT) 



in cn vo 



vo o r- 



■H rH O 



O 03 O 



CN OJ V0 



a\ -*i ld 



D 53 
a O 

O m 



S >< O 
U H a 



79 



O co 
o co 
< < 



(MOO 



r-{ O O 



H 
U Q 

a; a 



< a 

o J 

H U 



C\ CN U) 



< w 

O fc- 
H O 



D 2 

a o 

O n 

a. h 



H O 
CO U 



co < 

5: CQ 



80 






H g 



VD U) U3 
CO CA O 



U a a; 
U 



m o» vo 



o in o 



«< o j 

J HO 

9 j s 



in + «* r~ oo 
ld + CN (N in 









O VD o 



t- c~ w 



0*0^0 



O O O * O CN 

in * <n oo 



O CM 
kO CM 



o -^ *x> * ^o>cri* ^ a^ a* 

,-H i-H -tf * in *J< CM * in •* CN 






gg 



J >< o 
< H a. 



82 



: -. hi 

^ X 



12! H 
U U. 
K W 

3£ 



O en 



<j\ o * in f-H o 



CT\ 1J3 00 



O CN O 



0) 

J is 
< w 

O Cn 
H O 



0> cn m 

O -d" 

.-I rH O 



a 

& O 

O m 



83 






O ON >X> 



■3" [- IT) 



< < 



<N o o 



MOO 



u 




Q 


J 


S 


(N 


o 


a 


BJ 












w 


a 










« 


a 


u 










u 














& 






* 










►3 






00 


U) 


<Tl 




< 


D 




c> 








H 






•<* 




O 




O 


a 










J 


H 


u 










►j 




w 


• 










J 


2 




(N 








< 


H 




0\ 


OJ 






H 


tn 




>£> 


m 


O 




O 


fc 












H 


O 


* 


H 


H 


1 



rH CO IT! 






84 






CN VO 0\ 



m m o 






o o o 



o o o 



P4 


u 


Q 


« 


fN 


CN 




u 


a. 
W 


g 


J 






CN 


« 


P< 


U 


I 






+ 


u 












& 






n 










J 








a\ 


r- 




< 


Q 




in 


in 






H 


3 








a> 




O 


J 








CN 


^ 


H 


u 


* 






+ 


S 














« 




w 


n 








a 


►q 


2 




tN 


d- 




S 


< 


w 




CM 


00 






H 


b 






^r> 






O 


&< 












H 


O 


+ 


H 


H 


+ 



CN O 



o on o 



ao o CN 

CN CN 00 



crv r- o 
CN oo 

in in H 






85 



> w 

2 H 



O en 
< < 



o r~ o 



H <>» O 



o r~ o 



■<r m< o 



H 


H 




« 


m< 


LD 


o\ 


« 


^r 


in 


<X\ 


« 


U 


O 




in 


in 






in 


in 




u 




3 




















W 


j 




















o< 


u 


* 








* 








S> 






* 








* 










J 






i-H 


(N 


m 






CN 


a\ 




< 


q 






(N 








(N 






H 


S 








CTl 








CTl 




O 


j 


















J 


H 


u 


* 








* 








>< 






* 








* 












o in o 



< >> 


o 


O H 


fx 


Oi p 




U) O 


H 


2 U 


W 



86 



u> in r- 



r- o <T\ 



m -r l 

iH 00 

o\ in r-\ 



3£ 



in tf o 



.-i in in 



tt in o 



in H O 



<n <n in 

■* Tj" V0 



^ 



3 

D s 

Q< O 

O 1-1 

a- h 



<n o o 






u 


E-i 




4, 


o\ 


O 


Ol 


u 


s 


* 


(N 


<* 


r- 




w 


J 










P4 


Pj 


U 








+ 


U 






+ 








P 


J 




I 




(M 


CN 




< 


Q 






(N 






H 


ta 








Cf\ 




o 


j 








l£> 


J 


H 


u 










Jh 














1 


J 




* 


« 


■* 


r> 


< 


w 






in 






H 


u. 


* 






(N 



O VO CO 

O Ch 

in m o 



~> 




H 




n 


I* 


r* 


1* 






rr; 


« 




UJ 


< 


m 


S 


U) 



87 



2 H 

O Dm 

a; w 



O Dm 
H O 






1< ■<* o 



o o o 



88 



> W 



3£ 



< a 
o J 



H En 
O En 
H O 



cx o 

O M 

0< H 



in at o 



01 r- at 



C\ rH (N 



O H 

H EC 



89 



3£ 



O LTI LD + CM CM 



CT\ U> CT\ 



H 
U Q 



< a 

H « 

O J 

H U 



3 



o 


Eh 


X 


ffi 


n; 


O 






< 


w 


h 


K 



90 



a iu 



< < 



iH in in 






cn o o 



<N o o 



U 


U 


Q 


« 


,_| 


m 






3 








<* 




td 


J 








vo 


« 


Ch 


u 










u 














£> 


J 




* 


VD 


M 


in 




< 


Q 




IN 


in 






H 


a; 












O 


J 








in 




H 


u 








M 


^ 




cn 








+ 




J 


3 




in 


«) 


t^ 




< 


w 




ON 








H 


fa 


* 


00 


(N 


•** 



O Tf o 



O T* O 



O to 

Q J 
3 J 



91 



2 H 
OS U 



■tf (- CT\ 



«* •* o 






CN O O 



CM O O 



U) O O 



< W 

H &< 

O fc 

H O 



fN r-{ <£> 

•^ r- 

^i Tji vo 



in u r- 



P 53 

0* o 

O i-t 

a. h 



> os 

M < 

os a. 



92 



t- in *r 



^f yf t*> 



VD rn (N 



gg 



D 2 

o. O 

O M 

(X H 



in ix> o 



(N t- U3 



PJ i-l o 



cn r- r- 



in ao o 



O rH o 



O rH o 



J 


H U 


« 








>H 












K 


co 


* 








3 


►J 2 




in 


o 


CT\ 


s 


< W 












H fc. 






m 


r» 




O b. 












H O 


* 









O 00 o 

(N + 






o 


U 


« 




J o 








< • 


H 






E-> O 


2 




Q 




w 




a. 




u 




w 


< 






H >< 


U I 


w 




< H 




Qi 




H M 


J Q 






co co 


H O. 








< 






W [i] 


2 « 




* 


t-l > 



3 tt 
Cd < 
2 U 



J U 
P < 



> 




H 




CO 




a) 




Qj 


^ 


C 


u 


u- 


£ 


Pi 


a 


m 


< 



93 



.H 1X1 

CN <N 



ld in o 



m kD m 
+ 



< < 



r- ^ * o en 



O 0\ N 

rH (N 

<J\ IN 00 



U"l U"> O 



U Q 

a; a 



en ix> a\ 



en r^ o 
tn u) 

.H rH in 



w 


U W 


u 


CJ 


2 


w m 




- J 


5 


w o 


u, 


o 0- 




a 


CU 


o • 


w 


W H 


E 


o en 



en O 



> H 



u > 

O 2 



94 



02 w 

3£ 



O CO 

< < 



o o o 



o ■-! o 



(N (N O 



o o o 



a o 

O M 

a. H 



95 



2 H 






(N rH O 



l-l 

u 


H 

O Q 


K Pi 




W J 


K 


a, u 


u 




!=> 






J 




< Q 




h a 




O J 


J 


H U 


^ 




K 




i 






H fc 




O Cm 




B O 



00 <N C^ 

n en 

VD O CT\ 

in in 



W i-h H 
SUM 



96 



BE 

3S 



CM O O 



r-| rH O 



u n 
a. u 



LT) I/) VO 



in »a< u) 



2 H 

n E-« 

S3 



3 

D 2 

Cu O 

O m 



97 



2 H 

U fc 

a! w 






< Q 

H a: 
o J 



o o o 



0*000 



000 



Q 

►J « 

O U 

O < 



98 



(A 


« 


r» 


<N 


in 


h 




iXi 


U> 




^S 


I 






r~ 


X H 


* 









H (N O 






U> V0 Ifl 



.-t tJ< CT\ 



00*00 



CI Q 

b; a: 

la j 

fti u 



-tf M- O 



01^0 



0\ ON O 



S3 



ex o 
o H 
ft. H 



<T| CT\ H 



99 



(N CN O 



< a 

e-i « 

o J 

h o 



o fc 
H O 



r- U) i-- 



cn o o 



in a\ cn * cnoo* u)ino 

mm-* * m *J* 

r^ r^ i * o * in 

* o * CN 

r- r- * rH * + 



>£> in o 



o< O 
O M 
0, H 



< M 

3 J 

O I* O 

a h & 



100 



: ■ i.i 
-- x 



ic o *x> « o o 



o oo in * o o 



•& KD O 



O O O 



o o o * o r- 



< Q 

o a 



< w 

H tn 

O P- 

H O 



Q W 

3 M 

ta u 

H 2 

< pa 

H O 

en rf 



&u 


H 


H 


Li 


b 


DJ 


a 


w 


£ 




O 


w 


u 


w 



_q \ pa 

pa >< o 2 

s h m o 

O M J M 

K a; J w 

■ 5 Pa m 

IX o h > 

w pa s m 

s w M Q 



►a w 



101 



o co 
o to 



O U3 O 



o o o 



o o o 



fN U3 LTI 



O O O 



rsi o o 



fc. Q 






H 


* 


z 




O J 






a 






W 


W 






H 




H 


> 




H 




O 




H 




W &< 


2 








z 


H 


J i 


H 




W 






< 


j :* 


£ 


s 


a 






O 


§g 


pfl 













u 










Eh 


H CO 




-f) 






CO 


CO 


a < 











u 


H H 


£ w 


lu 


> 






l3 


l| 


pc 


•z 








CO 


CJ H 


a 


Q 




* 


Q 








H W n 

< [1] J 

H H O 

co u a 



102 



MUNICIPALITY 



MUNICIPALITY CRIME RATES 

Crime rates for individual cities and towns are listed in the following table. The 
rates for many cities are based on combined data reported by municipal, county and state 
law enforcement agencies due to overlapping jurisdiction. 



CRIME 
RATE 



TOTAL 
OFFENSES 



MURDER RAPE 



AGGRAVATED 
ASSAULT 



BREAKING OR 
ENTERING 



LARCENY M/V 
THEFT THEFT 



REGION I 






















CAROLINE COUNTY 






















DENTON 


2005 


4,932.7 


154 








7 


8 


29 


104 


6 




2006 


5,795.8 


189 








1 


8 


39 


130 


11 




% Change 


+ 17.5 H 


22.7 
















FEDERALSBURG 


2005 


6,743.3 


176 





2 


5 


18 


48 


98 


5 




2006 


7, 980.3 


211 





1 


9 


17 


48 


134 


2 




% Change 


+ 18.3 h 


19.9 
















GOLDSBORO 


2005 































2006 































% Change 






















GREENSBORO 


2005 


4,249.3 


75 





1 





11 


19 


40 


4 




2006 


3,437.7 


67 





1 





10 


19 


34 


3 




% Change 


- 19.1 


10.7 
















HENDERSON 


2005 


1,694.9 


2 


! 

















1 




2006 


1,694 .9 


2 











1 





1 







% Change 






















HILLSBORO 


2005 































2006 


613.4 


1 











1 













% Change 


N/A 


N/A 
















MARYDEL 


2005 































2006 


1,398.6 


2 











1 





1 







% Change 


N/A 


N/A 
















PRESTON 


2005 


2,773.0 


16 











1 


4 


11 







2006 


2,911.0 


17 











1 


5 


9 


2 




% Change 


+ 5.0 


f 6.3 
















RIDGELY 


2005 


5,399.4 


73 





1 


1 


8 


10 


50 


3 




2006 


4,565.5 


62 





1 


1 


12 


9 


39 







% Change 


15.4 


15.1 
















* TEMPLEVILLE 


2005 































2006 































% Change 






















CECIL COUNTY 


CECILTON 


2005 































2006 


205.8 


1 














1 










% Change 


N/A 


N/A 
















CHARLESTOWN 


2005 


1, 188.3 


13 














10 


2 


! 




2006 


548.4 


6 








1 





2 


3 







% Change 


53.9 


- 53.8 
















CHESAPEAKE 


2005 





























CITY 


2006 
% Change 


124.4 
N/A 


N/A 

















1 





ELKTON 


2005 


7, 407. 9 


1,050 





3 


36 


96 


175 


674 


66 




2006 


7,452. 1 


1,081 


2 


2 


50 


110 


182 


659 


76 




% Change 


+ .6 


+ 3.0 
















NORTH EAST 


2005 


6, 114 .5 


172 








6 


7 


24 


113 


22 




2006 


5,557.5 


157 





1 


4 


6 


22 


108 


16 




% Change 


9. 1 


8 .7 

















Although Templeville lies in Caroline and Queen Anne's Counties, for purposes of thi 
been shown in Caroline County. 



report data for the entire city has 



104 



MUNICIPALITY CRIME RATES 







CRIME 


TOTAL 


MURDER 


RAPE 


ROBBERY 


AGGRAVATE, 


UG OR 


LARCENY 


M/V 






RATE 


OFFENSES 








ASSAULT 




THEFT 




PERRYVIU.K 


2005 

* i'li.m.|.' 


5, 74 6. 8 
36 . 9 


217 

137 










! 










PORT DEPOSIT 


2005 
2006 

% Change 


1 , 585.0 
3,597.1 

♦ 126.9 


11 

25 

♦ 12 7.3 






o 












RISING SUN 


2005 


5, 142.5 


92 











2 


24 


64 


2 




2006 


4,413.4 


79 








1 


3 


15 


58 


2 




% Change 


L4.2 


14 . 1 
















DORCHESTER COUNTY 


CAMBRIDGE 


2005 


7, 838.3 


855 





7 


42 


89 


na 


5B2 


23 




2006 


7,891.0 


883 





3 


24 


96 


157 


572 


31 




% Change 


+ 0.7 


3.3 
















CHURCH CREEK 


2005 































2006 


1, 176.5 


1 
























% Change 


N/A 


N/A 
















EAST NEW MARKET 


2005 























o 






2006 


598 .8 


1 

















1 







% Change 


N/A 


N/A 
















ELDORADO 


2005 































2006 































% Change 






















GALESTOWN 


2005 































2006 































% Change 






















HURLOCK 


2005 


6,587.1 


127 











3 


37 


75 


12 




2006 


8,466.1 


170 








3 


7 


55 


93 


12 




% Change 


+ 28.5 


+ 33.9 
















SECRETARY 


2005 


198.8 


1 














1 










2006 


198.8 


1 

















1 







% Change 


+ 


+ 
















VIENNA 


2005 


3,571.4 


1 














I 










2006 


7, 142.9 


2 

















2 







% Change 


+ 100.0 


+ 100.0 
















KENT COUNTY 


BETTERTON 


2005 


266.0 


1 














1 










2006 


531.9 


2 














2 










% Change 


+ 100.0 


+ 100.0 
















CHESTERTOWN 


2005 


4,435.6 


200 


1 


3 


12 


42 


25 


106 


u 




2006 


5, 185.7 


243 





2 


15 


28 


41 


148 


9 




% Change 


+ 16.9 


+ 21.5 
















GALENA 


2005 


934.6 


4 











1 


! 


2 







2006 


1, 168.2 


5 











2 


2 


1 







% Change 


+ 25.0 


+ 25 
















* MILLINGTON 


2005 


4, 086.5 


17 











2 


6 


g 







2006 


1,201.9 


5 











1 


3 


1 







% Change 


70.6 


70.6 
















ROCK HALL 


2005 


1,080.7 


28 





1 








6 


19 


2 




2006 


1,826.7 


47 











2 


16 


28 


1 




% Change 


+ 69.0 


+ 67.9 

















Although Millington lies in Kent and Queen Anne's Counties, for purposes of this report data for the entire city has been 
shown in Kent County. 



105 



MUNICIPALITY CRIME RATES 







CRIME 


TOTAL 


MURDER 


RAPE 


ROBBERY 


AGGRAVATED 


BREAKING OR 


LARCENY 


M/V 






RATE 


OFFENSES 








ASSAULT 


ENTERING 


THEFT 


THEFT 


QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY 


BARCLAY 


2005 































2006 


1, 398.6 


2 














2 










% Change 


N/A 


N/A 
















CENTREVILLE 


2005 


5,405.4 


138 





2 


2 


3 


25 


96 


10 




2006 


3,524 .6 


94 











9 


21 


63 


1 




% Change 


34.8 


- 31.9 
















CHURCH HILL 


2005 


1, 132.1 


6 














2 


4 







2006 


3,018.9 


16 











1 


1 


13 


1 




% Change 


+ 166.7 


+ 166.7 
















* QUEEN ANNE 


2005 































2006 


2.3 


1 

















1 







% Change 


N/A 


N/A 
















QUEENSTOWN 


2005 


21.4 


9 














' 2 


g 


1 




2006 


30.9 


13 














8 


4 


1 




% Change 


+ 44.4 


+ 44.4 
















SUDLERSVILLE 


2005 


4,603.6 


18 














5 


13 







2006 


3, 069.1 


12 











1 


4 


5 


2 




% Change 


33.3 


33.3 
















SOMERSET COUNTY 


CRISFIELD 


2005 


6,415.2 


182 








3 


7 


32 


135 


5 




2006 


7, 173.3 


202 








6 


16 


26 


150 


4 




% Change 


♦ 11.8 


+ 11.0 
















PRINCESS ANNE 


2005 


7,042.8 


186 





1 


17 


24 


45 


95 


4 




2006 


7,478.6 


210 








7 


19 


67 


108 


9 




% Change 


+ 6.2 


+ 12.9 
















TALBOT COUNTY 


EASTON 


2005 


5,392.9 


698 


2 


8 


22 


63 


105 


491 


7 




2006 


4,894.7 


660 





4 


24 


54 


91 


477 


10 




% Change 


9.2 


5.4 
















OXFORD 


2005 


660.5 


5 











1 


2 


2 







2 0.06 


401 . 1 


3 














2 


1 







% Change 


39.3 


- 40.0 
















ST. MICHAEL'S 


2005 


6, 156.6 


70 











4 


22 


44 







2006 


7,829.2 


88 





1 


2 


4 


17 


61 


3 




% Change 


+ 27.2 


+ 25.7 
















TRAPPE 


2005 































2006 


350.9 


4 





2 








1 


1 







% Change 


N/A 


N/A 
















WICOMICO COUNTY 


DELMAR 


2005 


5,954.1 


122 





! 


3 


17 


27 


70 


4 




2006 


5,400.7 


124 





1 


6 


6 


25 


81 


5 




% Change 


9.3 


+ 1.6 
















FRUITLAND 


2005 


8,468.8 


323 





1 


6 


63 


26 


218 


9 




2006 


8,955.6 


355 








7 


70 


46 


227 


5 




% Change 


+ 5.7 


+ 9.9 
















HEBRON 


2005 


2,230.5 


18 





! 





2 


7 


8 







2006 


1, 982.7 


16 











1 


6 


9 







% Change 


11. 1 


11.1 
















MARDELA SPRINGS 


2005 


1,648.4 


6 

















6 







2006 


824 .2 


3 











1 





1 


1 




% Change 


50.0 


50.0 

















Although Queen Anne lies in Queen Anne' 
been shown in Queen Anne's County. 



and Talbot Counties, for purposes of this report the entire data for this city has 



106 



MUNICIPALITY CRIME RATES 



CRIME 


TOTAL MURDER 


RAPE 


ROBBERY 


AGGRAVATED 


BREAKING OR 


LARCENY 


M/V 


RATE 


OFFENSES 






ASSAULT 


,' I NG 







PITTSVILLE 


2005 
2006 

* Change 


36 8 


36 8 


o 






4 








SALISBURY 


2005 


11,697.7 


3,082 


1 


14 


161 


324 


.,,., 


1,844 


112 




2006 


12,367.7 


3,261 


5 


26 


217 


333 


643 


1,906 


131 




% Change 


+ 5.7 


+ 5.8 
















SHARPTOWN 


2005 
2006 

% Change 


1,694 .9 
♦ 266.7 


3 
11 

* 266.7 


' 



















WILLARDS 


2005 


1,599.1 


15 





1 
















2006 


1,492.5 


14 











4 


1 








% Change 


6.7 


6.7 
















WORCESTER COUNTY 


BERLIN 


2005 


3, 310.9 


123 





1 


3 


4 


22 


91 


2 




2006 


4,434 .3 


165 








1 


4 


22 


135 






% Change 


+ 33.9 


+ 34.1 
















OCEAN CITY 


2005 


21,513.0 


1,547 


x 


15 


49 


213 


232 


978 


59 




2006 


22,028.9 


1, 557 





9 


33 




229 


1,102 


49 




% Change 


+ 2.4 


+ 0.6 
















POCOMOKE CITY 


2005 


6,069.7 


244 





5 


4 


13 


32 


184 


6 




2006 


7,551.0 


296 


2 


2 


3 


8 


31 


238 


12 




% Change 


+ 24 .4 


+ 21.3 
















SNOW HILL 


2005 


2,094 .9 


49 











7 


11 


30 


x 




2006 


1,760.4 


41 





1 


1 


8 


12 


19 







% Change 


16.0 


16.3 
















REGION II 






















CALVERT COUNTY 






















CHESAPEAKE 


2005 


2,764.7 


94 


1 


1 


4 


5 


13 


65 


5 


BEACH 


2006 
% Change 


4,032.3 
+ 45.8 


140 
+ 48.9 











14 


19 


98 


9 


NORTH BEACH 


2005 


3,282.2 


62 








x 


3 


16 


41 


1 




2006 


3,020.7 


57 











3 


10 


41 


3 




% Change 


8.0 


8.1 
















CHARLES COUNTY 


INDIAN HEAD 


2005 


3, 945. 1 


135 


x 





4 


26 


18 


67 


19 




2006 


3,156.0 


108 





1 


3 


10 


26 


56 


12 




% Change 


- 20.0 


- 20.0 
















LA PLATA 


2005 


4,038.7 


330 





1 


8 


44 


26 


222 


29 




2006 


3,874.8 


328 





2 


17 


28 


38 


225 


18 




Change 


4 . 1 


0.6 
















PORT TOBACCO 


2005 































2006 


6,666.7 


1 

















1 







Change 


N/A 


N/A 
















ST. MARY'S COUNTY 


LEONARDTOWN 


2005 


7, 107.1 


142 





7 


3 


16 


27 


84 


5 




2006 


6,295.1 


131 





1 


2 


8 


17 


96 


7 




% Change 


11.4 


7.7 
















REGION III 






















ALLEGANY COUNTY 






















BARTON 


2005 


418.4 


2 

















2 







2006 































% Change 


- 100.0 


- 100.0 

















107 



MUNICIPALITY CRIME RATES 







CRIME 


TOTAL 


MURDER 


RAPE 


ROBBERY 


AGGRAVATED 


BREAKING OR 


LARCENY 


M/V 






RATE 


OFFENSES 








ASSAULT 


ENTERING 


THEFT 


THEFT 


CUMBERLAND 


2005 


6,033 .1 


1,274 


1 


20 


11 


122 


246 


846 


28 




2006 


7, 023 .7 


1,473 


1 


20 


25 


143 


311 


936 


37 




% Change 


+ 16.4 


+ 15.6 
















FROSTBURG 


2005 


4,097.1 


336 





1 


1 


33 


87 


207 


7 




2006 


4,624.1 


369 





2 


5 


25 


98 


229 


10 




% Change 


+ 12 .9 


+ 9.8 
















LONACONING 


2005 


505.5 


6 





1 








1 


4 







2006 


685.5 


8 








1 


1 


1 


5 







% Change 


+ 35.6 


+ 33.3 
















MIDLAND 


2005 































2006 


218.3 


1 














1 










% Change 


N/A 


N/A 
















WESTERN PORT 


2005 


2,569.1 


53 





j 





10 


15 


26 


1 




2006 


1, 382 .0 


28 








1 


1 


7 


19 







% Change 


46.2 


- 47.2 
















CARROLL COUNTY 


HAMPSTEAD 


2005 


2, 052.0 


112 





2 





5 


10 


gg 


7 




2006 


1,994 .1 


109 








1 


10 


14 


76 


8 




% Change 


2.8 


2.7 
















MANCHESTER 


2005 


2,300.8 


82 





2 





18 


19 


40 


3 




2006 


2,046.5 


73 





1 





10 


18 


36 


8 




% Change 


- 11.1 


11.0 
















*MT. AIRY 


2005 


2,287.9 


147 








2 


8 


24 


110 


3 




2006 


1,930.0 


124 





2 





11 


19 


89 


3 




% Change 


15.6 


- 15.6 
















NEW WINDSOR 


2005 


1,248 .2 


17 





1 





5 


5 


6 







2006 


880.4 


12 











2 


4 


6 







% Change 


29.5 


- 29.4 
















SYKESVILLE 


2005 


853.9 


38 











8 


5 


25 







2006 


763.7 


34 








1 


2 


10 


21 







% Change 


10.6 


10.5 
















TANEYTOWN 


2005 


2,068.8 


113 





2 





6 


5 


98 


2 




2006 


2,615.2 


143 








1 


3 


11 


124 


4 




% Change 


+ 26.4 


+ 26.5 
















UNION BRIDGE 


2005 


3,142.9 


33 





1 





7 


7 


18 







2006 


2,297.8 


25 











7 


7 


11 







% Change 


+ 26.9 


- 24.2 
















WESTMINSTER 


2005 


5, 182.0 


917 


1 


5 


17 


91 


109 


653 


41 




2006 


5, 193.7 


925 


1 





26 


113 


118 


636 


31 




% Change 


+ 0.2 


+ 0.9 
















FREDERICK COUNTY 


BRUNSWICK 


2005 


1,690.4 


89 





1 





13 


21 


51 


3 




2006 


1,655.3 


87 











5 


20 


60 


2 




% Change 


2.1 


2.2 
















BURKITTSVILLE 


2005 































2006 































% Change 






















EMMITSBURG 


2005 


1,209.8 


29 





1 





4 


8 


14 


2 




2006 


1,852.6 


44 








2 





21 


16 


5 




% Change 


+ 53.1 


+ 51.7 

















Although Mt . Airy lies in Carroll, Frederick and Howard Counties, for purposes of this report data for the entire city has been 
shown in Carroll County. 



108 



MUNICIPALITY CRIME RATES 







CRIME 


TOTAL 


MURDER 


RAPE 


ROBBERY 


AGGRA 


BREAKING OR 


LARCENY 


M/V 






RATE 


OFFENSES 








ASSAULT 


ENTERING 






FREDERICK 


2005 
2006 

1 change 


!;SI:S 


2, 072 
2,282 

+ 10.1 





1 1 

17 


118 
152 


361 






IH 


MIDDLETOWN 


2005 
2006 

% Change 


1,461 .8 
1,949.0 

+ 33.3 


39 
52 

+ 33.3 





o 












MYERSVILLE 


2005 


578.9 


8 











| 


2 


5 







2006 


1,085.4 


15 














2 


12 


1 




% Change 


+ 87.5 


♦ 87.5 
















NEW MARKET 


2005 


2,576.1 


11 














/ 








2006 


1,171.0 


5 























% Change 


54.5 


54.5 
















ROSEMONT 


2005 




















o 








2006 


366.3 


1 














1 









% Change 


N/A 


N/A 
















THURMONT 


2005 


1,820.9 


110 





1 


5 


24 


13 


59 


8 




2006 


1,420.8 


86 








2 


9 


19 


51 


5 




% Change 


- 22.0 


22.0 
















WALKERSVILLE 


2005 


1, 040. 1 


54 





l 





8 


12 


32 






2006 


1,213.4 


63 





2 





6 


8 


46 






% Change 


+ 16.7 


+ 16.7 
















WOODSBORO 


2005 


2,364 .1 


20 











2 


2 


15 






2006 


2,482.3 


21 














7 


14 







% Change 


+ 5.0 


+ 5.0 
















GARRETT COUNTY 


ACCIDENT 


2005 


1, 133.1 


4 














! 


3 







2006 


1, 133.1 


4 














1 


3 







% Change 






















DEER PARK 


2005 


987.7 


4 
















2 






2006 


1,975.3 


8 











2 


5 









% Change 


+ 100.0 


+ 100.0 
















FRIENDSVILLE 


2 005 


1,669.8 


9 











I 


4 


4 







2006 


2,597.4 


14 








1 


3 


4 


5 


1 




% Change 


+ 55.6 


+ 55.6 
















GRANTSVILLE 


2005 


1,973.7 


12 











3 


3 


6 







2006 


2,352.9 


14 











1 


6 


7 







% Change 


+ 19.2 


+ 16.7 
















KITZMILLER 


2005 


1, 986.8 


6 











1 


1 


4 







2006 


993.4 


3 














2 


1 







% Change 


50.0 


50.0 
















LOCH LYNN 


2005 


852.9 


4 














! 


2 


1 


HEIGHTS 


2006 
% Change 


2,345.4 

+ 175.0 


11 
+ 175.0 














6 


5 





MT. LAKE PARK 


2005 


1,556.9 


35 











2 


6 


26 






2006 


2, 179.7 


49 





1 





3 


9 


35 






% Change 


+ 40.0 


+ 40.0 
















OAKLAND 


2005 


4,437.6 


86 











6 


11 


67 






2006 


4,839.6 


92 











4 


15 


69 


4 




% Change 


+ 9.1 


7.0 
















WASHINGTON COUNTY 


BOONSBORO 


2005 


1,526.7 


46 





2 





1 


9 


33 


1 




2006 


1,471.6 


44 








1 


5 


13 


19 


6 




% Change 


3.6 


4.3 

















109 



MUNICIPALITY CRIME RATES 







CRIME 


TOTAL 


MURDER 


RAPE 


ROBBERY 


AGGRAVATED 


BREAKING OR 


LARCENY 


M/V 






RATE 


OFFENSES 








ASSAULT 


ENTERING 


THEFT 


THEFT 


CLEAR SPRING 


2005 


3,076.9 


14 








1 


1 


3 


8 


1 




2006 


3,956.0 


18 








2 


1 


4 


10 


1 




% Change 


+ 28.6 


+ 28.6 
















FUNKSTOWN 


2005 


1,932.9 


19 








1 


3 


3 


10 


2 




2006 


1,729.4 


17 








1 


1 


6 


7 


2 




% Change 


10.5 


10.5 
















HAGERSTOWN 


2005 


4,743.3 


1, 794 


2 


4 


84 


191 


332 


1, 044 


137 




2006 


4, 998.6 


1,921 


4 


8 


117 


168 


304 


1,171 


149 




% Change 


+ 5.4 


+ 7.1 
















HANCOCK 


2005 


5,098.5 


88 








1 


14 


23 


47 


3 




2006 


3, 101.7 


59 








5 


6 


15 


30 


3 




% Change 


39.2 


- 38.6 
















KEEDYSVILLE 


2005 


1,244.8 


6 














2 


4 







2006 


622.4 


3 














1 


1 


1 




% Change 


50.0 


50.0 
















SHARPSBURG 


2005 


1,302.5 










1 





3 


5 







2006 


1,591.9 


11 











1 


6 


4 







% Change 


+ 22.2 


+ 22.2 
















SMITHSBURG 


2005 


2,034 .9 


56 





1 





7 


10 


37 


1 




2006 


2, 162.5 


62 








2 


4 


13 


40 


3 




% Change 


+ 6.3 


+ 10.7 
















WILLIAMS PORT 


2005 


4,219.8 


86 








3 


17 


15 


45 


6 




2006 


2,755.7 


59 





1 


4 


10 


14 


28 


2 




% Change 


34.7 


31.4 
















REGION IV 






















MONTGOMERY COUNTY 






















TOWN OF CHEVY 


2005 


1, 870.9 


51 








1 





B 


38 


4 


CHASE 


2006 
% Change 


1,540.7 
17.6 


42 
17.6 








1 





6 


34 


1 


CHEVY CHASE 


2005 


1,824.0 


51 








1 


1 


10 


37 


2 


VILLAGE 


2006 
% Change 


933.9 
48.8 


26 
49.0 








-2 


1 


5 


20 


2 


GAITHERSBURG 


2005 


4,166.9 


2,439 





16 


102 


101 


311 


1,753 


156 




2006 


4,367.7 


2,527 


2 


13 


101 


95 


278 


1,830 


208 




% Change 


4.8 


3.6 
















GARRETT PARK 


2005 


872.4 


8 

















6 


2 




2006 


872.4 


8 














2 


6 







% Change 


+ 


+ 
















KENSINGTON 


2005 


4,111.1 


77 








9 


3 


12 


46 


7 




2006 


5,872.9 


110 








6 


4 


22 


74 


4 




% Change 


+ 42.9 


+ 42.9 
















POOLESVILLE 


2005 


3, 172.3 


130 








4 


3 


15 


104 


4 




2006 


1,683 .7 


69 





1 


1 


4 


7 


48 


8 




% Change 


- 46.9 


- 46.9 
















ROCKVILLE 


2005 


3,081.6 


1,773 


2 


10 


66 


69 


263 


1,190 


173 




2006 


3,200.2 


1,842 


3 


17 


75 


34 


252 


1,310 


151 




% Change 


+ 3.9 


+ 3.9 
















SOMERSET 


2005 


800.7 


9 


1 











2 


6 







2006 


622.8 


7 














3 


3 


1 




% Change 


22.2 


- 22.2 

















110 



MUNICIPALITY CRIME RATES 







CRIME 


TOTAL 


MURDER 


RAPE 


ROBBERY 


AGGRAVATED 


BREAKING OR 


LARCENY 


M/V 






RATE 


OFFENS1 B 








ASSAULT 








TAKOMA PARK 


2005 

2006 

% Change 


4, 953 .5 
4,270.9 

13.8 


878 
7 94 

9.6 


< 








. ) \ 


4i"i 


176 


PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY 


BERWYN HEIGHTS 


2005 


4,459.6 


137 





, 


7 


9 


10 


83 


27 




2006 


4,388.8 


135 








9 


5 


20 


76 


25 




% Change 


1.6 


1.5 
















BLADENSBURG 


2005 


15,589.0 


1, 244 




8 


137 


81 


169 


■1 '.- ' 






2006 


11,700. 3 


929 


3 


6 


69 


74 


116 




255 




% Change 


24.9 


25.0 
















BOWIE 


2005 


2,428.9 


1,221 


1 


5 


62 


67 


193 


659 


234 




2006 


2,212.1 


1,112 


2 


9 


63 


60 


161 


625 


192 




% Change 


12.7 


8.9 
















BRENTWOOD 


2005 


5,856.5 


173 


2 


2 


11 


9 


31 


74 


44 




2006 


7,572.2 


223 


2 


2 


22 


17 


39 


89 


52 




% Change 


+ 29.3 


+ 28.9 
















CAPITOL HGTS. 


2005 


6,052.2 


262 


1 


: 


31 


15 


27 


102 


85 




2006 


4,578.0 


198 





3 


42 


11 


14 


71 


57 




% Change 


24.4 


24 .4 
















CHEVERLY 


2005 


5,885.0 


395 








34 


14 


46 


181 


120 




2006 


4,875.9 


326 


1 





57 


11 


66 


131 


60 




% Change 


17 .1 


17.5 
















COLLEGE PARK 


2005 


6,620.2 


1,691 





8 


87 


65 


238 


1,042 


251 




2006 


6,826.5 


1,723 





9 


81 


50 


347 


1,016 


220 




% Change 


+ 3.1 


+ 1.9 
















COLMAR MANOR 


2005 


8,270.1 


109 








17 


4 


6 


47 


35 




2006 


7,218.8 


95 





1 


17 


5 


10 


40 


22 




% Change 


12.7 


12.8 
















COTTAGE CITY 


2005 


7, 179.1 


85 


3 





4 


6 


8 


42 


22 




2006 


7,888.0 


93 








13 


9 


17 


32 


22 




% Change 


+ 9.9 


+ 9.4 
















DISTRICT HGTS. 


2005 


7,755.4 


492 





2 


36 


14 


49 


170 


221 




2006 


4,973.9 


314 





5 


21 


32 


33 


146 


77 




% Change 


35.9 


- 36.2 
















EAGLE HARBOR 


2005 


1,818.2 


1 




















! 




2006 


9,090.9 


5 











1 


4 










% Change 


+ 400.0 


+ 400.0 
















EDMONSTON 


2005 


18,539.7 


259 





1 


5 


8 


30 


160 


55 




2006 


11,765.0 


169 








5 


6 


16 


101 


41 




% Change 


+ 36.5 


+ 36.7 
















FAIRMOUNT HGTS. 


2005 


11, 181.7 


176 





3 


15 


14 


20 


75 


49 




2006 


8,726.1 


137 


3 





7 


13 


27 


44 


43 




% Change 


22.0 


22.2 
















FOREST HGTS. 


2005 


7,612.3 


205 


x 


1 


13 


14 


56 


96 


24 




2006 


5,882.4 


158 








2 


13 


46 


72 


25 




% Change 


22.7 


- 22.9 
















GLEN ARDEN 


2005 


4,865.5 


322 


2 


2 


21 


25 


46 


123 


103 




2006 


4, 830.4 


309 





2 


31 


57 


35 


112 


72 




% Change 


0.7 


4 .0 
















GREENBELT 


2005 


6, 833.7 


1,527 


2 


13 


140 


92 


129 


837 


314 




2006 


6,003.7 


1,339 


2 


6 


163 


57 


109 


738 


264 




% Change 


12.1 


- 12.3 

















111 



MUNICIPALITY CRIME RATES 



CRIME TOTAL MURDER RAPE ROBBERY AGGRAVATED 
RATE OFFENSES ASSAULT 



BREAKING OR LARCENY M/V 
ENTERING THEFT THEFT 



HYATTSVILLE 



2005 
2006 



6,123.4 

7,462.8 



937 
1,248 



105 
121 



505 203 
795 183 



2005 
2006 



5,381.7 
4,143.1 



2005 
2006 



6,799.3 
6,328.3 



1,442 

1,404 



173 
194 



781 285 
834 226 



MORNINGS IDE 



2005 
2006 



8,602.9 
6,561.9 



117 
96 



60 27 
52 20 



MT. RAINIER 



NEW CARROLLTON 



2005 
2006 

% Change 

2005 
2006 

% Change 



6,76£ 
6,92£ 



7,824.3 
5,928.6 



985 
762 



59 
115 



217 221 
223 167 



425 290 
350 219 



NORTH BRENTWOOD 



2005 
2006 



6,183.4 
5,737.7 



RIVERDALE PARK 



2005 
2006 



7,085. 
7,491. 



472 

498 



207 121 
275 93 



SEAT PLEASANT 



UNIVERSITY PARK 



2005 
2006 

% Change 

2005 
2006 

% Change 



12,671.9 
11,049.8 



3,817.4 
3,073. 1 



645 
531 



260 166 
239 127 



UPPER MARLBORO 



2005 
2 0.06 



7,153.3 
5,985.4 



REGION V 
BALTIMORE CITY 



BALTIMORE CITY 



2005 
2006 



7,028.7 
6,847.6 



45, 061 
43,657 



269 
276 



162 3,935 
139 4,260 



6,943 
6,196 



7,3£ 
7,66 



20,132 6,232 
18,846 6,276 



ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY 



ANNAPOLIS 



HARFORD COUNTY 



2005 
2006 



% Change 



5,792.9 
6,857.3 



',496 
18.1 



11 186 
13 231 



245 
265 



1,202 
1,287 



152 

1 3 5 



2005 
2006 



6,714.6 
6,325.6 



961 
894 



111 
58 



131 
95 



604 
635 



2005 
2006 



6,046.0 
5,457.6 



HAVRE DE GRACE 



2006 
% Change 



4,763.5 
4,497.8 



557 
536 



367 
376 



112 



MARYLAND 
ARREST DATA 



ARREST DATA 



The Maryland Uniform Crime Reporting Program requires the submission of 
monthly reports of persons arrested in the state. A record of arrest 
activity for both Part I and Part II crimes are received from state, 
county and municipal law enforcement agencies showing the age, sex and 
race of persons arrested. Traffic arrests, except Driving While 
Intoxicated, are not reported. A total of 305,675 arrests for Part I 
and Part II criminal offenses were reported during 2006. In 2005, 
there were 308,075 arrests which represents a 1 percent decrease. 
Based on 2006 population estimates, there were 5,443.2 arrests per 
100,000 population in Maryland. The arrest rate for 2005 was 5,501.0 
representing a 1 percent arrest rate decrease. 

A person is counted on the monthly arrest report each time they are 
arrested. This means that a person may be arrested several times 
during a given month and would be counted each time. However, a person 
is counted only once each time regardless of the number of crimes or 
charges involved. A juvenile is counted as "arrested" when the 
circumstances are such that, if the juvenile were an adult, an arrest 
would have been counted or when police or other official action is 
taken beyond a mere interview, warning or admonishment. 

Arrest figures do not indicate the number of individuals arrested or 
summoned since, as stated above, one person may be arrested several 
times during the month. However, arrest information is useful in 
measuring the extent of law enforcement activities in a given 
geographic area as well as providing an index for measuring the 
involvement in criminal acts by the age, sex and race of perpetrators. 

During 2006, 16 percent of all reported arrests were for Crime Index 
Offenses, compared to 15 percent in 2005. Analysis of Crime Index 
Arrest Data indicates that larceny-theft comprised the highest 
percentage of all arrests for Crime Index offenses, with 49 percent of 
the total in 2006, down from 50 percent in 2005. The drug abuse, other 
assaults, driving under the influence and disorderly conduct 
categories recorded the highest percentage of arrests for Part II 
offenses. These offenses accounted for 46 percent of the total arrests 
for Part II offenses in 2006. 

5 YEAR TREND 

5 YEAR 
AVERAGE 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 



Juvenile 
Adult 


50,336 
261,660 


50, 560 
255, 115 


50,314 
257, 761 


52,231 
257, 546 


51,404 
273, 155 


47, 169 
264,722 


TOTAL 


311,995 


305,675 


308,075 


309,777 


324,559 


311,891 



114 



VIOLENT CRIME ARRESTS 

Violent Crime arrests represented 27 percent of all arrests for Crime 
Index Offenses and 4 percent of total arrests. In 2005, Violent Crime 
arrests represented 26 percent of all arrest for Crime Index offenses 
and 4 percent of total arrests. 

A further evaluation indicates that arrests for robbery and aggravated 
assault represented the highest percentage of the total arrests for 
violent crimes with 33 and 62 percent, respectively. 



PROPERTY CRIME ARRESTS 

Property Crime arrests represented 73 percent of all arrests for Crime 
Index Offenses and 11 percent of the total arrests. In 2005, Property 
Crime arrests represented 74 percent of all arrests for Crime Index 
Offenses and 11 percent of the total arrests. 

The highest percentage of property crime arrests, 67 percent, continues 
to occur in the larceny-theft category. 



GAMBLING ARREST 

A total of 356 gambling arrests were reported during 2006. In 2005, 
387 persons were arrested for Gambling violations resulting in an 8 
percent decrease. 

Arrests for Gambling offenses amounted to less than 1 percent of all 
reported Part I and Part II arrests in 2006. Persons under the age of 
18 made up 24 percent of all Gambling arrests in 2006, compared to 21 
percent in 2005. 

5 YEAR TREND 

5 YEAR 
AVERAGE 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 



Bookmaking 


2 


1 





3 


4 


4 


Numbers 


3 


4 


1 


8 





3 


Other 


345 


351 


386 


342 


398 


249 


Total 


351 


356 


387 


353 


402 


256 



DRUG ABUSE VIOLATION ARRESTS 

Information pertaining to drug abuse violation arrests is collected 
according to specific drug categories and whether the arrest was for 
sale or manufacture or possession of a specific drug. During 2006, a 
total of 56,728 arrests for drug abuse law violations were reported 
compared to 53,047 drug abuse law violation arrests in 2005, resulting 
in a 7 percent increase. 

115 



Evaluation of the reported data discloses that 31 percent of all persons 
arrested for drug abuse violations were under 21 years of age and 13 
percent were under 18 years of age in 2006, compared to 32 and 15 
percent respectively in 2005. 

Analysis of individual categories showed that the highest percentage of 
arrests, which involved opium or cocaine and derivatives, was 56 
percent in 2006 and 55 percent in 2005. Drug abuse arrests, for 
marijuana decreased to 41 percent in 2006 from 42 percent in 2005. Of 
the total drug abuse arrests 76 percent were for possession while 24 
percent were for sale or manufacture in 2006, compared to 75 and 25 
percent respectively in 2005. 

Possession of marijuana decreased to 36 percent of the total drug abuse 
arrests in 2006, from 38 percent in 2005. Possession of opium or cocaine 
and derivatives represented 3 7 percent of the total drug abuse arrests 
in 2006, an increase from 36 percent in 2005. Arrests for sale or 
manufacture of marijuana amounted to 4 percent of the total drug abuse 
arrests in 2006. Sale or manufacture of opium or cocaine and 
derivatives decreased to 18 percent of the total drug abuse arrests in 
2006, as compared to 19 percent in 2005. 



To aid in the study of drug arrests a chart by county is provided. 



5 YEAR TREND 





5 YEAR 














AVERAGE 


2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


Total 


53,586 


56,728 


53,047 


51,971 


54,560 


51,623 


Sales /Manu- 


14,450 


13,874 


13,189 


14,920 


16,350 


13,919 


facture 














Opium/ 


11,501 


10,402 


10,220 


12, 015 


13,358 


11,510 


cocaine 














Marijuana 


2,080 


2,349 


2,058 


2,088 


2, 152 


1,752 


Synthetic 


733 


941 


801 


696 


700 


529 


Other 


136 


182 


110 


121 


140 


128 


Possession 


39,135 


42,854 


39,858 


37,051 


38,210 


37,704 


Opium/ 


19,684 


21,220 


19, 061 


18,277 


19, 592 


20,269 


Cocaine 














Marijuana 


18,692 


20,700 


20, 049 


18, 130 


17,838 


16,744 


Synthetic 


271 


278 


261 


228 


334 


254 


Other 


488 


656 


487 


416 


446 


437 



116 



VO CO VO 






(U 


in 


VO 


0) 


pi 


o 


o 


CP 


a 


o 


o 


C 


si 


CN 


OJ 





117 



o 

■H © - 

o 3.2 



■U.C 



II 



<Xi ao a> 



CN <N CM 



liff 



in in cm 



vo oi m 



r- rH a\ 



in n in 



119 



•H d) 
3-H 
0) u 
4J C 
(0 (1) 

jj cn 






3.^ 



o u 



•o 



-U.C 



ld ^o n 



in vd cn 



in vo 










H 


>1 




•U 


<U 


C 


•U 


3 



u 


CO 



cri oo n 



120 



(N >f H 






121 



t~- rH U> 









3-H 



n. H 



S 

122 



■H 0) 

dJU 
W C 



ARRESTS 



CLASSIFICATION 
OF OFFENSES 



,ACK AMERICA!! 

CNDIAN 



MURDER & NON NEGLIGENT 
MANSLAUGHTER 

MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGLIGENCE 

FORCIBLE RAPE 

ROBBERY 

FELONIOUS ASSAULT 

BREAKING OR ENTERING 

LARCENY -THEFT 

MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 

OTHER ASSAULTS 

ARSON 

FORGERY & COUNTERFEITING 

FRAUD 

EMBEZZLEMENT 

STOLEN PROPERTY; BUYING, 
RECEIVING, POSSESSING 

VANDALISM 

WEAPONS; CARRYING, 
POSSESSING, ETC. 

PROSTITUTION & COMMERCIALIZED 
VICE 

SEX OFFENSES (EXCEPT FORCIBLE 
RAPE, PROSTITUTION & VICE) 

DRUG ABUSE VIOLATIONS 

GAMBLING 

OFFENSES AGAINST FAMILY 
AND CHILDREN 

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE 

LIQUOR LAWS 

DISORDERLY CONDUCT 

VAGRANCY 

ALL OTHER OFFENSES (EXCEPT 
TRAFFIC) 

SUSPICION 

CURFEW & LOITERING 
LAW VIOLATIONS 



15 


4 


16 


3 








401 


3 


172 


231 





1 


3, 944 


348 


969 


3,280 


1 


39 


6,231 


1, 807 


3,648 


4,315 





67 


6, 552 


1, 066 


3,942 


3,615 


1 


49 


14, 936 


8, 508 


11,268 


12,007 


3 


155 


3, 503 


570 


1,225 


2,824 





23 


22, 121 


9, 187 


13,612 


17,412 


2 


240 


474 


97 


320 


246 





4 


825 


404 


626 


595 





7 


1,371 


1,265 


1,728 


895 





12 


170 


185 


169 


184 





2 


178 


46 


102 


121 








3, 786 


847 


2,547 


2, 055 


3 


26 


3, 986 


460 


1,521 


2,887 





38 



46, 728 


10, 000 


19,216 


37,220 


3 


256 


351 


5 


34 


320 





2 


1,748 


563 


1,088 


1,211 





8 


19,287 


4,791 


19,031 


4,628 


3 


373 


4,732 


1,409 


4, 724 


1,350 





63 


5,165 


1,693 


3,224 


3, 595 





34 


111 


34 


84 


61 








87,819 


22,666 


49,053 


60, 528 


3 


804 


573 


153 


360 


360 





6 


256 


25 


54 


225 





2 



GRAND TOTAL 



123 



ARRESTS 



CLASSIFICATION UNDER 
OF OFFENSES 


10 


10-12 


13-14 


15 


A 
16 


17 JUVENILE 
TOTAL 


18 


19 


20 


21 


22 


23 


MURDER & NON NEGLIGENT 
MANSLAUGHTER 





1 





11 


11 


20 


43 


25 


22 


22 


18 


28 


15 


MANSLAUGHTER 
BY NEGLIGENCE 

















1 


1 


1 


1 


3 





2 


2 


FORCIBLE RAPE 


3 


3 


14 


16 


10 


13 


59 


24 


18 


14 


23 


14 


20 


ROBBERY 


4 


70 


425 


421 


449 


433 


1,802 


430 


306 


225 


164 


120 


132 


FELONIOUS ASSAULT 


22 


195 


502 


395 


397 


345 


1, 856 


418 


290 


310 


301 


267 


247 


BREAKING OR ENTERING 


33 


223 


697 


549 


657 


547 


2, 706 


425 


382 


246 


233 


252 


214 


LARCENY -THEFT 


49 


571 


1,892 


1,495 


1, 735 


1, 764 


7,506 


1,185 


1, 029 


834 


729 


632 


594 


MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 


5 


50 


343 


375 


437 


375 


1, 585 


256 


194 


143 


118 


115 


101 


OTHER ASSAULTS 


123 


1, 007 


2,460 


1,819 


1,826 


1,612 


8, 847 


952 


967 


888 


928 


926 


927 


ARSON 


13 


65 


112 


76 


44 


25 


335 


26 


10 


8 


8 


9 


6 


FORGERY & COUNTERFEITING 


1 


3 


9 


6 


13 


33 


65 


52 


48 


55 


49 


55 


55 


FRAUD 





3 


10 


11 


14 


26 


64 


47 


70 


93 


65 


89 


100 


EMBEZZLEMENT 





1 





2 


10 


30 


43 


23 


22 


20 


29 


22 


20 


STOLEN PROPERTY; BUYING, 
RECEIVING, POSSESSING 





1 


1 


1 


11 


8 


22 


4 


9 


14 


10 


10 


9 


VANDALISM 


56 


352 


714 


457 


467 


439 


2,485 


232 


193 


162 


140 


122 


97 


WEAPONS; CARRYING, 


10 


109 


406 


352 


341 


407 


1,625 


286 


284 


244 


193 


180 


163 



PROSTITUTION & 
COMMERCIALIZED VICE 



SEX OFFENSES (EXCEPT 
PROSTITUTION & VICE 



DRUG ABUSE VIOLATIONS 


5 


104 


GAMBLING 








OFFENSES AGAINST 


1 


12 


FAMILY AND CHILDREN 







DRIVING UNDER THE 
INFLUENCE 



916 1,355 2,298 2,835 
16 25 21 25 



7,513 3,474 3,351 2,997 2,576 2,215 2, 



LIQUOR LAWS 





4 


90 


144 


394 


658 


1,290 


910 


DISORDERLY CONDUCT 


4 


147 


590 


511 


593 


583 


2,428 


303 


VAGRANCY 





4 


17 


17 


7 


9 


54 


6 


ALL OTHER OFFENSES 
(EXCEPT TRAFFIC) 


57 


352 


1, 552 


1,788 


2,146 


2,283 


8,178 


3,503 


SUSPICION 





4 


24 


22 


29 


43 


122 


59 


CURFEW & LOITERING 
LAW VIOLATIONS 





6 


39 


66 


83 


87 


281 






34 23 

35 41 



084 
13 
49 



688 



763 1,125 1,140 1,241 



783 588 186 157 

307 260 326 257 

3 2 2 2 



138 

239 

5 

918 

37 




GRAND TOTAL 



407 3,392 11,169 10,225 12,342 13,025 50,560 13,226 13,477 12,42111,485 10,842 10,530 



124 



ARRESTS 



MURDER & NON NEGLIGENT 
MANSLAUGHTER 

MANSLAUGHTER BY 
NEGLIGENCE 

FORCIBLE RAPE 

ROBBERY 

FELONIOUS ASSAULT 

BREAKING OR ENTERING 

LARCENY THEFT 

MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 

OTHER ASSAULTS 

ARSON 

FORGERY & COUNTERFEITING 

FRAUD 

EMBEZZLEMENT 

STOLEN PROPERTY; BUYING, 
RECEIVING, POSSESSING 

VANDALISM 

WEAPONS; CARRYING, 
POSSESSING, ETC. 

PROSTITUTION & 
COMMERCIALIZED VICE 

SEX OFFENSES (EXCEPT 
FORCIBLE RAPE, 
PROSTITUTION & VICE) 

DRUG ABUSE VIOLATIONS 1 

GAMBLING 

OFFENSES AGAINST FAMILY 
AND CHILDREN 

DRIVING UNDER THE 1 
INFLUENCE 

LIQUOR LAWS 

DISORDERLY CONDUCT 

VAGRANCY 

ALL OTHER OFFENSES 3 
EXCEPT TRAFFIC) 

SUSPICION 

CURFEW & LOITERING 
LAW VIOLATIONS 



18 


53 


23 


18 


17 


5 


9 


5 





1 


2 r, 


322 





4 


1 





2 


2 














18 


19 


14 


59 


33 


50 


48 


9 


10 


5 


1 


3 


345 


404 


99 


338 


204 


204 


163 


60 


29 


13 


2 


1 


2,490 


4,292 


220 


1, 027 


764 


709 


696 


467 


217 


133 


55 


61 


6, 182 


8,038 


185 


718 


494 


534 


614 


351 


180 


46 


23 


15 


4, 912 


7,618 


548 


2,274 


1,637 


2, 009 


2, 027 


1,343 


664 


227 


121 


85 


15,938 


23,444 


81 


383 


268 


323 


269 


139 


56 


28 


7 


7 


2,488 


4,073 


921 


3,685 


2, 702 


2,946 


2, 854 


1, 960 


946 


456 


206 


197 


22,461 


31,308 


5 


32 


29 


29 


35 


17 


13 


1 


6 


2 


236 


571 


51 


212 


132 


151 


149 


96 


37 


16 


3 


3 


1, 164 


1, 229 


107 


455 


356 


390 


372 


200 


124 


53 


35 


16 


2,572 


2,636 


5 


44 


32 


25 


28 


24 


9 


7 


2 





312 


355 


5 


32 


14 


31 


31 


17 


9 


2 


4 


1 


202 


224 


94 


296 


184 


213 


190 


128 


60 


18 


11 


8 


2, 148 


4,633 


146 


480 


216 


190 


180 


117 


63 


31 


21 


27 


2,821 


4,446 



106 

188 

6 

, 702 

26 




7,209 4,467 5,337 5,698 4,381 2,181 

38 26 17 7 6 7 

371 360 428 374 231 112 

4,443 2,800 2,560 2,651 2,099 1,291 



928 


281 


5 


1 


49 


20 



15,197 11,527 13,614 14,081 10,425 5,347 2,316 1,005 



7 1,673 1,708 

1,353 



30 1,04! 



401 


283 


308 


362 


301 


195 


61 


45 


27 


673 


369 


390 


466 


346 


188 


63 


31 


24 


16 


6 


10 


17 


12 


4 












105 49,215 56,728 

3 269 356 

17 2,280 2,311 

256 23,779 24,078 

851 6,141 

430 6,858 

91 145 

161 102,307 110,485 



604 726 
281 



GRAND TOTAL 



38,906 27,355 31,012 31,811 23,028 11,916 5,404 2,267 1,760 255,115 305,675 



125 



< 

< 

Q 
H 

C/2 



j en 

£3 



126 



g3 



127 



x co 
fn < 
O 



O CN (N 



VD Ov O 



CN VO <N * rS< in 









in U3 in 
ro *tf cm 

<N 1/1 + 



J CO 

< a 

H K 

o a 

E- < 



128 



en o\ o 



Ul « H 



o r- o 



vo a\ o 
m o h 

LD VO + 



in u> cn 



>x> r- <N 



O LTI rH 



J o 
w a. 



(N CN O 



129 



P q 



< w 
o « 



a\ r- u> 



2 H 
O S 
H W 



J 


J 


o 


O 


5: 


b 


' 1 


w 




H 


0. 


< 


w 


f' 


:•: 


W 



130 



J o 
h a 
en a. 



o r- oi 



O CM .H 



131 



X CO 
H < 
O 



SB 






CN O O 



J CO 

< W 

H K 

o b; 

H < 



t^ O ,-H 



132 



co < 



133 



CN O O * (NO 



O O 

H < 



O CD 

r-i O 

CM (N 



ti< cr> r- 



.n r~ 



O CN CTi 

-^ co + 



J 


-") 




o 


u 


a, 


[1] 




u 


w 




E-t 


04 


< 


en 


EH 


£ 


CO 



H 




01 


fc, 


W 


u. 


:i: 




u 


K 


i>; 


w 


o 


K 


n 


C/) 



134 



U J 



o oo 

CN ■* 



r- r- (n 



o vo 

r"1 00 

<-i in 



135 



.-H O O 



^o <n r- 



rH O O 



O a; 



136 



Bo 



U> O LTI * >£> O 



137 



(N (T\ 

ITl rH 

<N fN 



<N ^ O 



<3< O O 









■J H 



CTy O ^ 






in o o 

00 00 rH 

O ON I 



0< H 
2 Q 






2; x 

W < 



138 



J o 
w a. 



o o o 



^o in t- 



o u> o 



r-l CN (N 



139 






rH LTI O + O O 






O 05 
H < 



b 


w 


O 


05 




o 


>H 


:i: 


H 


w 






CO 


§ 


w 


w 


> 


H 



140 



J o 



rH O O 



in r~ (N 



LTl cn in 



141 






cm o r- 



IS 


3 


o 


S 




H 


J 


HI 


< 


w 


H 


K 


o 


K 


H 


'£ 



■tf CN 

ro O 

in lti 



co < 

£ CD 



w u 

CO M 

« J 

w o 

s a 
o 

CO h 

I H 

a < 

CO H 

2 CO 



142 



CN O O * O O 



143 






H 5 



H 
►J CO 

< ia 
h * 
o « 



a < 
CO H 

2 W 



m vo W 

o o O 
o o 2 



un vo Kl 
o o O 
o o 2 



144 






J o 

H « 



r-4 f» Ifl 

a\ u) m 
r- o + 






r~ r- * o o 



145 



►J w 

< w 

E- CC 



a. a. 

X. CD 






Ch 00 (N 



fN [- U3 



O Q 
E- < 



r- O 

oo r- 



146 



u 



J o 

H K 



o\ 1/1 

CN U> 

o o 



147 



(N O O 



<n r- in 



P q 



<: w 

h a. 

o K 

H < 



148 



5 o 



j o 

H Oi 
CO ft 



149 



O <D< 



O O O 



CN CTl CN 



1/1 (N tH 



lo r- <-i 



150 



J o 



u> n cm 



cr\ r- u> 



o en o\ 



oo lo lo 

r- -h + 

vo r- 



^< vo vo 



O CO o 



151 



.-I CI -tf 









in o i 

lo in 



o r- in 



LD L/l o 

m 41 h 

vf U3 + 



CT\ O 

CD U5 

O O 



ro r- in 
n< o\ + 
r- o 



> O 

< 
u w 



O H 
U 

W 

w o 



2 W 



152 



J o 



(N (N 



(N VD * O O 



OJ o o * o o 



153 



< 



en o o 



<J\ o o 



££ 



un o o 



CN CT\ <N 



U> ■** CTl 



en ctn o 



ft < 

2 co 



154 



J o 
u) a 



at in cn * o o 



CN in <N 
CO CT\ U> 
iH fN + 



ID VO ^ 



in en 



155 



VO r-4 O 



m o h 



O <# iH 



m ko o 

rH in <N 
(N <N + 



H 

O PJ 
H < 



W > 



156 



o o ♦ o o 



oo o-\ in 






157 



< 






cn r- o 



158 



►J o 



CN O 

O CM 

CN CN 



CN O 

O (N 

CN CN 



0*00 



CN O ON 



159 



S£ 



J E-i 



o a 
h < 



o o 

o o 

CM fN 



w u 

a a; 

w < 

s pa 



H 


< 


t] 


o 


O 


H 


u 






UJ 


J 


u 


J 


M 


o 


J 


b: 


o 


K 


a 


9 




cj 


H 




H 


o. 


< 


CO 


H 



160 



J o 



161 






O O 

H < 



o « 



« i4 



rH rH O 



162 



gs 



** M- O 



(N CD \D 



O O O 



o\ in 

00 00 



163 



Q 



s pa 



CO cn n * r*1 (N o 

in co + * <T\ o\ + 

t- r- * in in 



U W 
m U 

a, m 



164 



(T\ r- in 



vo o o + o o 



165 



rsi * o o 






< w 

O Di 



t: < 
5 o 

O H 



u: 


( i 


u. 


u, 


o 


W 




H 


o. 


■ i: 


en 


i • 



166 



t- o + o o 



CN (N * 

t-H O O * O O 



<N m r~ 



in oo id * iH o 



[^ <T| ON 



167 



>x> \o r- 



oo r- 

LTl U> 

0\ O 



(N O O 






>£> m o\ 



o cr\ r-< 






O C- iH 

00 03 + 



O Ch CM 






< X 
3 w 



0< K 



M P 



161 



►J o 
h a. 



CN kD 






CN <N O 



t- fN a\ 



CN i-H U> * tfl O 

r~ in + + in o\ 

l£> CT\ « CN rt 



in in 

r- o <J< 



<# V> (N 



m CN VD 

(N in + 
in in 



r- in iH 



169 



H in 



(N r- \d 

00 1X1 I 



a\ cn in 



U3 CM iH 



o vr> 

oo o 



o ix> in 



a a; 



H w 

§^ 

O J 

H O 

2 CU 
O 

S Cd 

i H 

a< < 

W H 



170 






171 



r^ ts ct> 






o\ in <n 



X W 
H < 
O 



< 



172 



a < 

Is 



173 






U> [^ O 



IN •>* O 



174 



ON 00 fNJ 



in »* t~- 



II 



J o 

E-> &. 



175 



< 

Eh h) 






H 
H « 

o a 

H < 



o a 
w a. 
O 



176 



u .J 



J o 



177 



CN (N 

r- o 



ko r- 
in o 



Oi lo + o o 



< W 

H « 

o a 

H < 



r» ^< vo 



O Q 

HI Dm 
H 



178 



J o 

CO Cu 



179 



< 



o\ 0"\ o 



O 00 o 



O 00 o 



S < 

O H 



M W 



o u 



180 



J o 



181 



in r- 



o o in 

CO r» rH 

o r- i 



< W 
H ft: 
O a 



182 



§3 



►J o 
H « 

en o. 



f~ IT! CN 



O C\ \D 



o m 

CN <N 



o a\ 

<N IN 



LTI U"> CN 

on m + 

O rH 

(N fN 

t- t- o 






183 



K CO 
H < 
O 



Eh 

< w 

H « 
O K 

H < 



r» ' oj rH 



o oo r» 






m w 



184 



-a o 
h Pi 
m a, 



185 



U3 rj> CM 






CT\ T U3 



vo o» in 



o 



cs in 
a\ if 

CN (N 



CN (N 

(N (M 



P q 






H & 

o a: 



w 


« 


J 


u 


u 


;;i 


o< 


K 


CO 


^ 


£ 


CQ 



186 






in r~ 



(N O 

"*• CO 

(N (N 



►J o 
en a< 



187 



n- ct\ r- 
vo r- + 



o rf o 



H 

< W 
H a; 
o a 



cn o o 



H Vi 

M O 



188 



■J o 
h a. 
w a. 






00 CTl r-i 

01 CT\ rH 
CO 0> + 



o oo 

O CTl 



ixi r- o 
<n m ^H 

rH U) + 



189 



in r» o 



o o 



o 


H 


u 


O 




H 


w 




tf 


u 


o 


u 


s 






J 


H 


o 


J 


a< 


< 




CD 


w 




H 


ft 


< 


Oj 


H 



190 



J o 

H « 

w a, 



a\ oo o * H t- 



C^ rH 

n (n 



CTl rH 

(N CN 



ixi o t- 
ao in h 

C\ rH + 



n y> r« 



■3< CD O 

rH r- n 
(N cn + 



191 



CN CN CN 

U) 00 rH 

\x> in i 



in in 

in oo 

\c in 



H 00 

o a\ 






Q U 

Bi m 

O J 

fc. O 



192 



J o 

H K 



o o « o o 



o ^ o 



■* u> o 



H o in 

n CO + 

O O 



193 



in f) 
in ix> 

in in 



,J 05 

< W 

h a. 

o & 



194 



Pi < 



195 



ffi co 

H < 
O 



gg 



O tN LD + O O 



H 
►J CO 
< W 
H K 
O « 



CO w 



o o 



h o 

<, a. 



o D u 
b; co cm 
H <: o 



196 



gs 



J o 



h o o 



a\ o 
r- ■* 



^f (N o * o o 



197 






H 

< W 
H K 
O « 



H X 
2 < 



198 



199 



LAW 

ENFORCEMENT 

OFFICERS 

KILLED AND 

ASSAULTED 



LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS KILLED 



Three law enforcement officers died in the line of duty in Maryland 
during 2006. The following summary is based on information provided 
by their agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Federal 
Bureau of Investigation conducts in-depth investigation of these 
tragic incidents in which law enforcement officers have made the 
supreme sacrifice in the performance of their duties. 



May 19,2006 

A 31 year old officer of the Baltimore Police Department died as a 
result of an on duty motor vehicle crash. The eleven year veteran 
was returning to the station house at three o'clock in the morning 
when he was struck and killed. 



September 1,2006 

An eighteen year veteran of the Maryland Transportation Authority 
Police died as a result of complications from injuries he received in 
a December 2005 motor vehicle crash. The 39 year old officer was 
struck while driving a motorcycle as part of a funeral escort . 



November 27, 2006 

A 28 year old Deputy with the Harford County Sheriff's Office was 
found dead in his vehicle after it was involved in a single vehicle 
crash. The two year veteran was responding to a call for service. 



203 



LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ASSAULTED 



The following information is based on a detailed monthly collection 
of data in the Uniform Crime Reporting System regarding the problem 
of assaults on local, county and state law enforcement officers. 
The large number of reported assaults on sworn officers is in part 
due to a prevalent attitude of disrespect for law enforcement in 
certain elements of our society. 

A total of 4,177 law enforcement officers in Maryland were victims 
of assault in the line of duty during 2006, compared to 4,166 
assaults during 2005 resulting in less than 1 percent increase. 

The rate of assaults on law enforcement officers for the state was 
28 assaults per every 100 sworn officers in 2006, the same as in 
2005. 

Physical force was used in 86 percent of all assaults on police 
officers . 

The greatest number of assaults, 33 percent, occurred while 
officers were responding to disturbance calls (family disputes, man 
with a gun, etc.), 27 percent of assaults on police officers 
occurred between 10:00 P.M. and 2:00 A.M. 

A total of 3,988 assaults on law enforcement officers were cleared 
during 2006 amounting to a 95 percent clearance rate. 







5 


YEAR TREND 












INJURY 


VS NON- 


INJURY 








5 YEAR 


2006 


2005 




2004 


2003 


2002 




AVERAGE 














No Personal 
Injury 


3,290 


3,377 


3,405 




3, 146 


3,200 


3,321 


Personal 
Injury 


708 


800 


761 




722 


542 


714 


Total 


3,998 


4,177 


4,166 




3,868 


3,742 


4,035 


Weapons 


Firearm 


83 


105 


84 




54 


96 


76 


Knife 


48 


54 


44 




46 


45 


50 


Other 


479 


414 


494 




501 


470 


516 


Physical 
Force 


3,388 


3, 604 


3, 544 




3,267 


3, 131 


3, 393 


Total 


3,998 


4,177 


4,166 




3,868 


3,742 


4,035 



205 



Q 

H 

<! 
co 

CO 

y 

o 



CN 


m 


rH 


O 


o 


O 


O 


ro 


LD 


cn 


» 





m 


ID 


o 


V0 


o 


H 


CN 


- 



< CD 

m 



m 



*S 






^F oo 

ID Q\ 



CO 


LD 


CN 


O 


^t 1 


o 


LD 


m 


m 



r- vo 
r- *& 

^ CN 



rH VD 

in r» 













cn 












P 

















CO 




CD 




■H 




P 




a 




U 




03 







Cn m 


-H 




CU 




p 


C Sh 


a 




>H 




w 


-H CU 


cn 




*H 






p a 


3 




< 




& 


iH 


CO 


CO 








cn 




r— 1 


u 




CQ 


a-H 


4H 


i—l 


CD 




P 


cn u 





cd 


^ 




-H 


c ft 




u 


P 




P 


cd 


c 




o 




w 


iH 4H 





Q) 






!h 


H 


-H 


u 


en 




3 




p 


a 


a 


u 


ft 


- >, 


CO 


fO 


-H 


CU 




01 T> 


Ol 


x} 


P 


£ 


u 


a o 


■h cn 


rH 


a 


p 


• H 


-H P 


p C 


3 


e 


o 


4-1 


rH cn 


cn o 


-p 


0) 




4-1 


T3 3 


cu cn 


CD 


p 


i— i 


cd 


C U 


> in 


•H 


-p 


r— i 


n 


cO 


n cu 


Q 


< 


< 


H 


K ta 


H ft 



VO 


VD 


00 


00 


CN 


in 


m 


00 


CN 


ro 




ro 
o 


LD 


<T\ 


cn 


VD 


O 


CN 


LD 


CO 


H 


<# 


rH 


ro 


00 


cn 


00 


<tf 


LD 


00 


■^ 


00 


rH 


CO 




v© 
00 

ro 


LD 


LD 


CO 


VD 


rH 


vo 


VD 


o 

H 


H 


<* 




VD 
rH 


l> 


<# 


O 


rH 


O 


t^ 


^ 


00 


rH 


ro 




H 


"tf 


H 


[> 


<j\ 


^r 


00 


LD 


0> 


H 


cn 




ro 


o\° 


o\° 


o\° 


o\° 




o\° 


rH 


o 


CN 


\> 


o 


O 


H 


CN 


O 


o 


o 


O 
O 
rH 

H 
ftf 

4J 



cn 












cn 






cn 






cu 






cn 






u 






Q) 






01 






u 









TJ 




01 






u 


CD 











ft 


01 




U 








G 


H 


ft 






fi 


CO 


CD 








-H 


!h 


TS 


G 








CD 


H 


•H 






cn 


Q 











cu 




cn 


CO 






-H 


>i 


•H 


CD 






jh 


r— 1 


Q 


■H 






rO 


c— 1 




rH 


& 




rH 


CO 


i-H 


CU 


CO 




01 


P 


•H 


£) 


G 




SH 


g 


> 


X3 


X) 




3 


CD 


■H 





E 




PQ 


S 


U 


ft 


< 





206 





O 




o 




CO 


H 


1 


J 


rH 


m 


O 


< 




w 


VD 


CO 




< 




Cn 




o 






O 




O 


w 




a 


VD 


H 


| 


Eh 


rH 



C\] 


CN 


VD 


VD 


CN 


LO 


CO 


CN 


VD 


CO 


rH 


LD 


^r 


^r 


CTi 


r- 




^ 


PO 


ro 


CN 


CO 


rH 


CD 


VD 


r- 


r- 


co 


cn 


CN 


r~ 


CD 


VD 


O^ 


lO 


CN 


S 


S 


< 


ft 



Pi H H 



H 

W « 

M W 
.J J 

o u 



*l< O iH r-4 O O 



G 


„ 




W 






H 






- 


* 




P 


* 




< 


„ 




on 






<n 






< 


* 


s i 

O i 


<S1 


* 


a i 


OS 


* 


W i 


w 




3 i 


u 




tt ' 






O i 


- 




h i 


— 




Ch ' 


o 


* 




H 


* 




Z 


* 




W 


* 




S 


* 




- 


* 




u 


¥ 




^ 






o 






Ex. 


* 




z 


* 




w 


„ 


ft! 


£ 


* 


U Q 


< 
- 


* 


< 




* 






* 


S < 

O 




* 


i- 



u w 

M U 

to b; 

>< o 



w o 

X a. 

H 2 

o w 



o o o 



o o o 



O O VC rH r- 



ooooooooo 



ooorHOiHno 



207 



OS 25 

W O 

H < 

o w 



o o o o o 



o o o o 



o o o o 



In H 

S3 

J CO 

< CO 

H < 

o 

H 



208 



w 
U 

u. 
u. 
O 

H 
Z 

w 

u 

o 

Li 

z 

w 

< 



in r- r- 



m w 
J .J 

o u 



(N (N LD rl<OrHOO 



05 2 

H O 

DC a 

E- < 

O W 



U Q 

l-H W 



kO CN (N <N 



OOOOO tN OO 



o o o o o 



209 



o o o 



o o o 



o 


J, 




- 






H 






- 


* 




S3 


* 




< 


* 




w 






Cfl 


* 




< 


* 


2 i 
O i 


w 


* 


d. i 


OJ 


„ 




H 




2 i 


U 




b. i 






O i 


- 


+ 


H i 


- 




0< ' 


O 


* 


H ' 


H 


* 




Z 


* 




H 


* 




S 


* 




u: 


* 




U 


+ 




05 






O 






- 


* 




z 


* 




w 


* 


c2 


£ 


* 


U Q 


< 
- 


* 


< 




* 


< en 




* 


o 




* 


H 



CO 

« s 

H O 

H < 
O W 



iH OJ O 



O O O ,-H ,H 



O O O O O 



O (N CN 



O O O 



210 



w 


w 


< 


J 


O 


X 


CQ 


< 


pg 


w 




H 


J 




1 


o 


J 




H 


o 


o 


o 




u 


u 


H 


a 






Q 


u 


V) 


w 


s 








< 


j 






s 


o 


pj 


PS 


o 


a, 



211 



O U) U3 



0\ U3 VD 



W 

w o 

x a 
E- < 

O W 



O CN ** T O O 



o o o o o o 



O O rH rH O O 



O IT) O 



O m O O 



cm o r- r- 



O 
H 



< M M 



212 



M U 
>H O 



a 2 
W O 

X CU 

h a 

O W 
3 



r- o o 



•^< o r~ r- 



o o .-I 



o o o 



o o o 



213 



o < 
o o 



Q 


» 




H 






H 






- 


* 




U> 


* 




< 


* 




05 






Cfl 






< 


* 


2 ' 

O i 


Cfl 


* 


Q* i 


££ 


* 


< < 


w 




S ' 


u 




t, 1 






O i 


to 
- 


* 




O 


* 


>> 1 


H 


* 




Z 


* 




- 


* 




S 


* 




w 


« 




u 


¥ 




£* 






o 






fa 


* 




Z 


* 


Cfl 


£ 


* 


W 
U Q 


< 
- 


* 


[14 H 

< 




* 


J CO 




* 


o 






en 
« S 
w o 
a o. 
h < 
o w 



rH O M 1 OJ 



OOCNOOOOOO 



214 



— 
Ee9 


* 




H 






nJ 


* 




-j 


* 




< 


t 




in 






VI 


* 




< 


* 


2 i 
O i 


(S) 


* 


Pu I 


C* 


¥ 




W 




3 i 


u 




Ck i 






O i 


S 


Q 


W i 


u- 




o< i 





* 


H i 


H 


* 




Z 


* 




u 


* 




§ 


* 




UJ 


* 




U 


Q 




C* 






O 






u. 


* 




£ 


* 




w 


* 


tt 


2 


* 


w 

U Q 
M W 


< 

-J 


* 


< 




* 


►J 01 
< Ol 




* 


%« 




* 


H 



u w 

M U 

oi & 

>H o 



O O O .H rH 



H 


O 




J 


« 


w 


4 


o 


o 


O 


u 


W 




o 


,4 


M 




J 


< 


w 


O 



o 




H 




X 


< 


h 


H 


H 


IX 




03 


o 


01 




s: 




2 


H 


> 


3 


J 




a 


< 




O 



215 



< Q 

fa 

fa a 

U < 

o u 



cj w 

M tj 

w a; 

>H o 

K fa 



w o 

DC ft 

H < 

O W 



U Q 

M fa 

fa H 

J en 

< en 

H < 
O 
H 



o 


« 




* 


ei 


i_i 




ft 




H 




O 


en 








a 




s 


a 


Z 


pfi 




o 






E 


o 


H 




s 




H 


w 


< 








J 




3 


H 




H 




< 




O 


w 




J 




CD 


5 


H 



216 



en r^ in o 



iH (N o o 



1" rH (N (N CN (N 



o o o 



Q 


„ 




- 






H 






- 


* 




P 


* 




< 


« 




<n 






Xfl 


* 




< 


* 


2 i 
O i 


1/3 


* 


O. i 


2 


# 


< i 
W 1 


w 




S i 


u 




[14 1 






O ' 


E 


t 


W i 


fa 






O 


* 


H I 


H 


* 




Z 


* 




- 


* 




S 


* 




w 


* 




u 


„ 




as 






o 






- 


* 




z 


* 


en 


W 


+ 


£ 


* 


w 

U Q 


< 

— 


* 


< 




* 






* 


H < 
O 




* 


H 



r~ in en r- r» 



en * en 



o o o o 



<n o o o 



■H O O O 



£ £ 



217 



o o o 



Q 


+ 




u 






H 






J 


* 




P 


* 




< 


« 




co 






C/3 


* 




< 


* 


2 i 
O ' 


C/5 


+ 


Cu i 


g 


t 


< ' 

a < 


UJ 




S i 


u 




Du i 






O i 


[I 


¥ 


H i 


u_ 




04 i 





* 




H 


* 




Z 


* 




u- 


* 




§ 


* 




u 


* 




U 


¥ 




tf 













u. 


* 




z 


* 




UJ 


« 


« 


2 


* 


U Q 


< 
-J 


* 


< 




* 


J to 
< en 




* 


H < 



CO Pi 

t» o 



to 
a 2 

H O 

ffi a. 
H < 
o w 



o 


CO 


M 






en 


H 


> 




U 




> 


H 


a 




CO 




Q 


to 


g 


H 


w 


w 


CO 


s 


s 




« 


« 
u 


g 


u 


o 


M 


« 


fc 


h-1 


w 


2 


s 



218 



LAW 

ENFORCEMENT 

EMPLOYEE 

DATA 



LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE DATA 



POLICE EMPLOYEE DATA 

The Uniform Crime Reporting Program in Maryland incorporates the 
collection of pertinent data relating to the police of the State. 
Information regarding police employee strength is discussed in this 
section. 

This information is submitted by county, municipal and state law 

enforcement agencies and compiled on an annual basis. Specific 

information concerning the number of law enforcement employees 
reflects the status as of October 31, 2006 

LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE RATES 

In 2006, the average number of full-time law enforcement employees 
(state, county and municipal) including civilian employees, amounted 
to 3.6 for each 1,000 inhabitants of the state. In 2005 the average 
number of full time law enforcement employees amounted to 3.5 for 
each 1,000 inhabitants. The rate based on sworn personnel only 
(excluding civilians), amounted to 2.7 per 1,000 population, 
unchanged from 2 005. 

The ratio of law enforcement employees per 1,000 population in any 
given area or municipality is influenced by a number of factors, 
much the same as the crime rate. The determination of law 
enforcement strength for a given county or municipality is based on 
factors such as population density, size and character of the 
community, geographic location, proximity to metropolitan areas and 
other conditions which exist in the area generating the need for law 
enforcement services. Employee rates also differ among agencies 
since, in particular, there is a wide variation of the 
responsibilities and level of activity within various law 
enforcement agencies. The information in this section relates to 
reported police employee strength and should not be interpreted as 
recommended strength for any area. 

CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES 

The personnel of each law enforcement agency differ as to the 
demands and responsibilities placed before them. Many police 
officers are fully occupied with clerical tasks and are not free to 
perform active police duties. Some police administrators use 
civilians in this capacity, thus freeing the sworn personnel for 
actual police related services. 

As of October 31, 2006, 5,050 or 25 percent of the total number of 
police employees in Maryland were civilians. 



220 



LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE RATES 





♦NUMBER SWORN 


**RATE 


REGION I 


1 


236 


2 .9 


Caroline County 




59 


1.8 


Cecil County- 




225 


2.3 


Dorchester County 




93 


3.0 


Kent County 




41 


2. 1 


Queen Anne ' s County 




112 


2 .4 


Somerset County 




87 


3 .4 


Talbot County 




132 


3 .7 


Wicomico County 




261 


2.9 


Worcester County 




226 


4 .6 


REGION II 




620 


1.9 


Calvert County 




135 


1.5 


Charles County 173 




312 


2 .2 


St. Mary's County 




173 


1.8 


REGION III 


1 


115 


1.8 


Allegany County 




147 


2 .0 


Carroll County 




269 


1.6 


Frederick County 




385 


1.7 


Garrett County 




81 


2.7 


Washington County 




233 


1.6 


REGION IV 


3 


710 


2 .1 


Montgomery County 


1 


509 


1.6 


Pr. George's County 


2 


,201 


2.6 


REGION V 


7 


, 555 


3.1 


Baltimore City 


3 


,422 


5.4 


Anne Arundel County 




985 


1.9 


Baltimore County 


2 


,138 


2.7 


Harford County 




429 


1.8 


Howard County 




581 


2 .2 


STATEWIDE 




812 


N/A 


STATE TOTALS 


15 


,048 


2.7 



♦Number sworn persons only 
**Rate per 1,000 population 



221 



LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE DATA 



NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER 
TOTAL SWORN CIVILIAN MALE FEMALE 



REGION I 


1, 512 


1,236 


276 


1, 208 


304 


CAROLINE COUNTY 


65 


59 


6 


57 


8 


Denton 


12 


11 


1 


9 


3 


Federal sburg 


9 


8 


1 


9 





Greensboro 


4 


4 





4 





Preston 


1 





1 





1 


Ridgely 


5 


5 





5 





Sheriff's Dept. 


30 


27 


3 


. 26 


4 


State Police 


4 


4 





4 





CECIL COUNTY 


284 


225 


59 


227 


57 


Elkton 


44 


33 


11 


32 


12 


North East 


8 


7 


1 


7 


1 


Perryville 


3 


2 


1 


2 


1 


Port Deposit 


2 


2 





2 





Rising Sun 


6 


5 


1 


5 


1 


Sheriff ' s Dept . 


91 


73 


18 


71 


20 


State Police 


130 


103 


27 


108 


22 



DORCHESTER COUNTY 110 93 17 89 21 



Cambridge 
Hurlock 

Sheriff ■ s Dept . 
State Police 


59 

10 

38 

3 


47 
9 

34 
3 


12 

1 
4 



47 
8 

32 
2 


12 
2 
6 
1 


KENT COUNTY 


45 


41 


4 


37 


8 


Chestertown 
Rock Hall 
Sheriff's Dept. 
State Police 


13 
4 

21 
7 


12 
4 

18 
7 


1 

3 



10 
4 

16 
7 


3 

5 




QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY 130 112 18 112 18 



Centreville 


10 


9 


1 


7 


3 


Sheriff's Dept. 


50 


47 


3 


44 


6 


State Police 


70 


56 


14 


61 


9 



222 



LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE DATA 



TOTAL 



NUMBER 
SWORN 



NUMBER 
CIVILIAN 



NUMBER NUMBER 
MALE FEMALE 



SOMERSET COUNTY 



105 



87 



18 



81 



24 



Crisfield 


13 


9 


4 


9 


4 


Princess Anne 


13 


12 


1 


11 


2 


UMES 


11 


9 


2 


9 


2 


Sheriff's Dept . 


23 


20 


3 


18 


5 


State Police 


45 


37 


8 


34 


11 



TALBOT COUNTY 



160 



132 



28 



123 



37 



Easton 


60 


46 


14 


42 


18 


Oxford 


3 


3 





3 





St. Michael's 


6 


5 


1 


4 


2 


Sheriff's Dept. 


18 


16 


2 


12 


6 


State Police 


73 


62 


11 


62 


11 



WICOMICO COUNTY 



333 



261 



72 



265 



68 



Delmar 


13 


12 


1 


13 





Fruitland 


14 


13 


1 


12 


2 


Salisbury 


109 


83 


26 


83 


26 


Salisbury State 


19 


15 


4 


13 


6 


Sheriff's Dept. 


101 


80 


21 


77 


24 


State Police 


77 


58 


19 


67 


10 



WORCESTER COUNTY 



280 



226 



54 



217 



63 



Berlin 


16 


11 


5 


10 


6 


Ocean City 


118 


99 


19 


91 


27 


Ocean Pines 


16 


12 


4 


14 


2 


Pocomoke City 


21 


14 


7 


13 


8 


Snow Hill 


7 


6 


1 


6 


1 


Sheriff's Dept. 


52 


45 


7 


42 


10 


State Police 


50 


39 


11 


41 


9 


REGION II 


936 


620 


316 


673 


263 


CALVERT COUNTY 


159 


135 


24 


128 


31 


Sheriff's Dept. 


112 


96 


16 


92 


20 


State Police 


47 


39 


8 


36 


11 



223 



476 


312 


164 


331 


145 


11 


10 


1 


11 





415 


262 


153 


279 


136 


50 


40 


10 


41 


9 



LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE DATA 

NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER 
TOTAL SWORN CIVILIAN MALE FEMALE 

CHARLES COUNTY 

LaPlata 

Sheriff's Dept . 
State Police 



ST. MARY'S COUNTY 301 173 128 214 87 

St. Mary's College 
Sheriff's Dept. 
State Police 



REGION III 1,611 1,115 496 1,336 275 

ALLEGANY COUNTY 172 147 25 153 19 

Cumberland 51 49 2 47 4 

Frostburg 19 15 4 16 3 

Frostburg State 18 14 4 14 4 

Luke 1 10 10 

Westernport 3 3 3 

Sheriff's Dept. 22 20 2 20 2 

State Police 58 45 13 52 6 



CARROLL COUNTY 417 269 14 8 3 52 65 



15 


2 


13 


13 


2 


231 


128 


103 


158 


73 


55 


43 


12 


43 


12 



Hampstead 


10 


8 


2 


7 


3 


Manchester 


5 


5 





4 


1 


Springfield Hosp. 


13 


4 


9 


9 


4 


Sykesville 


7 


6 


1 


6 


1 


Taneytown 


12 


11 


1 


11 


1 


Westminster 


57 


43 


14 


42 


15 


Sheriff's Dept. 


93 


67 


26 


75 


18 


State Police 


220 


125 


95 


198 


22 


EDERICK COUNTY 


505 


385 


120 


405 


100 


Brunswick 


9 


7 


2 


7 


2 


Frederick 


165 


128 


37 


127 


38 


Thurmont 


11 


10 


1 


9 


2 


Sheriff's Dept. 


223 


165 


58 


176 


47 


State Police 


97 


75 


22 


86 


11 



224 



LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE DATA 

NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER 
TOTAL SWORN CIVILIAN MALE FEMALE 



^RETT COUNTY 


124 


81 


43 


111 


13 


Oakland 


7 


6 


1 


6 


1 


Sheriff ' s Dept . 


53 


30 


23 


47 


6 


State Police 


64 


45 


19 


58 


6 



WASHINGTON COUNTY 3 93 233 160 315 78 

Boonsboro 3 3 3 

Hagerstown 117 97 20 92 25 

Hancock 5 4 14 1 

Smithsburg 4 3 13 1 

Sheriff's Dept. 208 81 127 164 44 

State Police 56 45 11 49 7 



REGION IV 4,745 3,710 1,035 3,443 1,302 

MONTGOMERY COUNTY 2,033 1,509 524 1,421 612 

Chevy Chase 15 

Gaithersburg 4 9 

MD Nat. Cap. Park 10 9 

Montgomery 1,509 

Rockville 78 

Takoma Park 5 

Sheriff's Dept. 157 

State Police 66 

PR. GEORGE'S COUNTY 2,712 2,201 511 2,022 690 



9 


6 


45 


4 


84 


25 


105 


404 


52 


26 


36 


14 


130 


27 


48 


18 



10 


5 


37 


12 


72 


37 


035 


474 


61 


17 


36 


14 


110 


47 


60 


6 



Berwyn Heights 


8 


7 


1 


6 


2 


Bladensburg 


22 


17 


5 


17 


5 


Bowie State Univ. 


26 


12 


14 


16 


10 


Capitol Heights 


11 


9 


2 


7 


4 


Cheverly 


14 


12 


2 


12 


2 


Cottage City 


6 


5 


1 


5 


1 


District Heights 


13 


10 


3 


11 


2 


Edmonston 


7 


7 





7 





Fairmount Heights 


2 


2 





2 





Forest Heights 


8 


7 


1 


7 


1 


Glen Arden 


7 


6 


1 


5 


2 


Greenbelt 


65 


54 


11 


58 


7 



225 



LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE DATA 

NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER 
TOTAL SWORN CIVILIAN MALE FEMALE 



PR. GEORGE'S COUNTY 












(CON'T) 












Hyattsville 


43 


33 


10 


29 


14 


Landover Hills 


4 


3 


1 


3 


1 


Laurel 


68 


52 


16 


52 


16 


MD Nat. Cap. Park 


106 


79 


27 


74 


32 


Morningside 


7 


6 


1 


6 


1 


Mt . Rainier 


16 


14 


2 


12 


4 


New Carrollton 


10 


8 


2 


7 


3 


North Brentwood 

















Pr . George ' s 


1, 629 


1, 394 


235 


1,231 


398 


Riverdale Park 


24 


18 


6 


18 


6 


Seat Pleasant 


16 


14 


2 


12 


4 


UMCP 


120 


89 


31 


89 


31 


University Park 


8 


8 





8 





Upper Marlboro 


5 


5 





5 





Sheriff's Dept . 


332 


234 


98 


210 


122 


State Police 


135 


96 


39 


113 


22 



REGION V 9,992 7,555 2,437 7,324 2,668 

BALTIMORE CITY 4,441 3,422 1,019 3,181 1,260 

Baltimore City 
Coppin State 
General Services 
Morgan State Univ 
MD Transit Admin. 
Univ. of Balto. 
UMB 

Sheriff's Dept. 
State Police 

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY 1,336 985 351 977 359 



3,712 


2, 974 


738 


2, 707 


1, 005 


17 


15 


2 


10 


7 


110 


43 


67 


69 


41 


41 


35 


6 


29 


12 


207 


146 


61 


127 


80 


37 


12 


25 


24 


13 


142 


56 


86 


95 


47 


153 


125 


28 


99 


54 


22 


16 


6 


21 


1 



Annapolis 


158 


115 


43 


110 


48 


Anne Arundel 


857 


644 


213 


633 


224 


General Services 


80 


39 


41 


49 


31 


Sheriff's Dept. 


85 


63 


22 


56 


29 


State Police 


156 


124 


32 


129 


27 



226 



LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE DATA 

NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER 
TOTAL SWORN CIVILIAN MALE FEMALE 

BALTIMORE COUNTY 2,852 2,138 714 2,171 681 

Baltimore Co. 
Towson University- 
Rosewood 
UMBC 

Sheriff's Dept . 
State Police 



HARFORD COUNTY 520 429 91 420 100 



2, 173 


1, 826 


347 


1,698 


475 


65 


40 


25 


49 


16 


6 


6 





5 


1 


36 


25 


11 


28 


8 


86 


71 


15 


69 


17 


486 


170 


316 


322 


164 



Aberdeen 


52 


42 


10 


39 


13 


Bel Air 


41 


30 


11 


33 


8 


Havre de Grace 


38 


29 


9 


30 


8 


Sheriff's Dept. 


313 


264 


49 


254 


59 


State Police 


76 


64 


12 


64 


12 



HOWARD COUNTY 843 581 262 575 268 



Howard 


531 


380 


151 


357 


174 


Sheriff's Dept. 


58 


36 


22 


43 


15 


State Police 


254 


165 


89 


175 


79 



STATEWIDE AGENCIES 1,302 812 490 961 341 

Comp . of Treasury 
MD Trans. Authority 
Natural Resources 
State Fire Marshal 
DPS&CS-IIU 



MARYLAND'S TOTAL 20,098 15,048 5,050 14,945 5,153 



88 


26 


62 


46 


42 


599 


441 


158 


462 


137 


519 


284 


235 


376 


143 


74 


43 


31 


61 


13 


22 


18 


4 


16 


6 



227 



CRIME INDEX FOR MARYLAND 

[0 YEAR TREND 





AVERAGE 


2006 


2005 


2004 


2003 


2002 


2001 


2000 


1999 


1998 


1597 












MURDER 














OFFENSES 


508 


547 


552 


521 


525 


528 


463 


-i IS 


492 


511 


501 


*RATE 


9.4 


9.7 


9.9 


9.4 


9.5 


9.7 


8.6 


8.3 


9.5 


10.0 


9.8 


PERCENT CLEARED 


60 


58 


60 


54 


55 


55 


57 


6B 


62 


68 














RAPE 














OFFENSES 


1,445 


1, 178 


1,266 


1,316 


1, 358 


1,364 


1,453 


1,508 


1,482 


1,707 


1,813 


*RATE 


27 


21.0 


22.6 


23.7 


24.7 


25.0 


27.0 


28.5 


28.7 


33.2 


35.6 


PERCENT CLEARED 


56 


58 


55 


55 


52 


56 


55 


55 


56 


60 


55 












ROBBERY 














OFFENSES 


14,305 


14,375 


14,378 


12,761 


13,302 


13,687 


14,252 


13,707 


14, 124 


15,303 


17,158 


• RATE 


266.6 


256.0 


256.7 


229.6 


241.5 


250.8 


265.1 


258.8 


273.1 


298.0 


336.8 


PERCENT CLEARED 


26 


33 


26 


26 


26 


27 


25 


25 


24 


24 


26 










AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 












OFFENSES 


24,575 


22,011 


23,173 


24,339 


23,593 


26,709 


26,748 


26,201 


26,105 


23,260 


23,614 


•RATE 


457.5 


392.0 


413.8 


437.9 


428.3 


489.3 


497.6 


494.7 


504.7 


453.0 


463.6 


PERCENT CLEARED 


63 


70 


64 


62 


65 


63 


63 


63 


54 


62 


62 












BURGLARY 















OFFENSES 41,958 37,457 35,921 36,682 38,641 39,721 42,799 39,654 43,629 47,235 47,839 

•RATE 764.5 667.0 641.4 660.0 701.4 727.7 796.2 748.7 843.6 919.9 939.1 

PERCENT CLEARED 17 18 17 17 17 17 15 17 16 17 19 

LARCENY -THEFT 

OFFENSES 143,247 127,500 128,483 129,786 134,369 144,074 147,594 146,156 150,020 158,431 166,054 

*RATE 2,673.0 2,270.4 2,294.2 2,335.1 2,439.1 2,639.6 2,745.9 2,759.5 2,900.6 3,085.3 3,259.8 

PERCENT CLEARED 19 20 20 20 19 19 17 18 19 20 20 

MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 

OFFENSES 31,750 30,522 34,070 35,858 36,406 35,882 33,289 26,622 26,067 28,140 30,646 

•RATE 592.9 543.5 608.4 645.2 660.9 657.4 619.3 540.4 504.0 548.0 601.6 

PERCENT CLEARED 12 12 11 9 10 13 13 14 15 13 14 

GRAND TOTAL 

OFFENSES 256,987 233,590 237,843 241,263 248,194 261,965 266,598 256,286 261,919 274,587 287,625 

•RATE PER 4,790.9 4,159.6 4,246.9 4,340.8 4,505.3 4,799.5 4,959.8 4,838.8 5,064.2 5,347.4 5,646.3 

PERCENT CLEARED 23 24 23 22 22 23 22 23 22 23 23 

* Rate per 100,000 population 



229 



bg m mmrn 





ttJ 


H 


2 


O 


H 


*1 




> 


to 


5 


PI 


3 


» 




F 


o 


w 


'Z 


o 


o 




H 


H 


H< 


^ 


H 


s 




M 




£ 


g 


a 






£ 


fd 




M 






o 


M 


21 


t 1 


sz; 






Stf 


H 


U 




H 






M 


K) 




*J 










H 


en 


M 


fO 






2 


M 


i-3 


n 


M 






U 


fl 


> 


o 


►tf 








en 


H 


w 


O 






to 


H 


M 


a 


W 






M 


O 




w 


i-3 






tSJ 


s: 


►a 




H 






O 


2 


O 


a 


3 






00 


^ 


IT 
H 


H 

< 


Q 




h-3 


0J 


o 


n 


en 


cn 




O 


00 


> 


M 


H 


M 








D 




o 
S3 


n 

H 

o 

S3 





o 
o